Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia

The objective of this study is to examine the possible factors contributing to the issue of inconclusiveness in capital structure studies. This study also attempts to provide logical explanations to the unresolved issue of inconsistencies in the relationship between factors identified and leverage i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haron, Razali
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/31138/1/Capital_Structure_Inconclusiveness._Evidence_from_Malaysia.pdf
_version_ 1796878122908385280
author Haron, Razali
author_facet Haron, Razali
author_sort Haron, Razali
collection IIUM
description The objective of this study is to examine the possible factors contributing to the issue of inconclusiveness in capital structure studies. This study also attempts to provide logical explanations to the unresolved issue of inconsistencies in the relationship between factors identified and leverage in capital structure studies. Comparisons are also made between the Malaysia and the developed market to see whether the findings are consistent with both market landscapes. This study employs two models in its methodology which are static and dynamic models to examine the effects of using different models in the study. The Fixed Effect model and Partial Adjustment model represent the static and dynamic models respectively. The dynamic model is estimated using Generalised Method of Moments. This study also uses six definitions of leverage to examine the impact of using different leverage definition in capital structure studies. To test the robustness of the findings comparison were made with past studies done by other researchers on developed markets. This study found that the use of different models (with the same leverage definition) and different leverage definitions (using the same model) give different results including signs. Inconsistencies are more obvious in the different leverage definitions (using the same model) compared to the use of different models (with the same leverage definition). There is also evidence that the findings in Malaysia are consistent with both the emerging and the developed markets as other studies on developed markets also report inconsistent results when using different models and different leverage definitions.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T23:17:02Z
format Proceeding Paper
id oai:generic.eprints.org:31138
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T23:17:02Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:311382013-08-22T06:48:39Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/31138/ Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia Haron, Razali HG4001 Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance. The objective of this study is to examine the possible factors contributing to the issue of inconclusiveness in capital structure studies. This study also attempts to provide logical explanations to the unresolved issue of inconsistencies in the relationship between factors identified and leverage in capital structure studies. Comparisons are also made between the Malaysia and the developed market to see whether the findings are consistent with both market landscapes. This study employs two models in its methodology which are static and dynamic models to examine the effects of using different models in the study. The Fixed Effect model and Partial Adjustment model represent the static and dynamic models respectively. The dynamic model is estimated using Generalised Method of Moments. This study also uses six definitions of leverage to examine the impact of using different leverage definition in capital structure studies. To test the robustness of the findings comparison were made with past studies done by other researchers on developed markets. This study found that the use of different models (with the same leverage definition) and different leverage definitions (using the same model) give different results including signs. Inconsistencies are more obvious in the different leverage definitions (using the same model) compared to the use of different models (with the same leverage definition). There is also evidence that the findings in Malaysia are consistent with both the emerging and the developed markets as other studies on developed markets also report inconsistent results when using different models and different leverage definitions. 2013-07-02 Proceeding Paper PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/31138/1/Capital_Structure_Inconclusiveness._Evidence_from_Malaysia.pdf Haron, Razali (2013) Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia. In: Seminar Hasil Penyelidikan Sektor Pengajian Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Ke-3 2013, 2 & 3 July 2013, EDC Hotel, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah.
spellingShingle HG4001 Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance.
Haron, Razali
Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title_full Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title_fullStr Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title_short Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia
title_sort capital structure inconclusiveness evidence from malaysia
topic HG4001 Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance.
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/31138/1/Capital_Structure_Inconclusiveness._Evidence_from_Malaysia.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT haronrazali capitalstructureinconclusivenessevidencefrommalaysia