Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009

This study of three parliaments in Bangladesh during 1991–2006 argues that parliament has failed to become the centre of political and legislative activities. This is mainly because the ruling parties deliberately bypass parliament, while the opposition deserts it. The parliament has been dysfunctio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moniruzzaman, Md.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/4618/1/Parliamentary_Democracy_in_Bangladesh.pdf
_version_ 1825644566695378944
author Moniruzzaman, Md.
author_facet Moniruzzaman, Md.
author_sort Moniruzzaman, Md.
collection IIUM
description This study of three parliaments in Bangladesh during 1991–2006 argues that parliament has failed to become the centre of political and legislative activities. This is mainly because the ruling parties deliberately bypass parliament, while the opposition deserts it. The parliament has been dysfunctional for more than half of its tenure. For the short periods it has been active, its business sessions were devoted more to party political bickering than legislative activity. Due to the opposition boycott, the ruling party’s negligence and the absenteeism of ordinary members, the standing committees of the parliaments were less effective, and parliamentary accountability of government was lacking.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T22:34:43Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:4618
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T22:34:43Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:46182011-11-14T01:46:11Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/4618/ Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009 Moniruzzaman, Md. JQ Political institutions Asia This study of three parliaments in Bangladesh during 1991–2006 argues that parliament has failed to become the centre of political and legislative activities. This is mainly because the ruling parties deliberately bypass parliament, while the opposition deserts it. The parliament has been dysfunctional for more than half of its tenure. For the short periods it has been active, its business sessions were devoted more to party political bickering than legislative activity. Due to the opposition boycott, the ruling party’s negligence and the absenteeism of ordinary members, the standing committees of the parliaments were less effective, and parliamentary accountability of government was lacking. Routledge 2009-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/4618/1/Parliamentary_Democracy_in_Bangladesh.pdf Moniruzzaman, Md. (2009) Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 47 (1). pp. 100-126. ISSN 1466-2043 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14662040802659017 10.1080/14662040802659017
spellingShingle JQ Political institutions Asia
Moniruzzaman, Md.
Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title_full Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title_fullStr Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title_full_unstemmed Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title_short Parliamentary democracy in Bangladesh: an evaluation of the parliament during 1996-2009
title_sort parliamentary democracy in bangladesh an evaluation of the parliament during 1996 2009
topic JQ Political institutions Asia
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/4618/1/Parliamentary_Democracy_in_Bangladesh.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT moniruzzamanmd parliamentarydemocracyinbangladeshanevaluationoftheparliamentduring19962009