| Summary: | Many schools assume that it is logically possible to teach religious education
in schools and that it can be taught in a non-confessional manner. However, some
philosophers have argued that non-confessional religious education is not possible
without imparting religious beliefs. This book is considered significant because it
attempts to explore logically the debate by presenting arguments and views of
different philosophers.
Hand begins his book by outlining the main arguments in the introduction
chapter, particularly focusing on the possibility of imparting religious
understanding without imparting religious belief. His concern is to discuss
whether teaching religious education in schools is a futile practice, examining the
claim that ‘non-confessional religious education is a logically incoherent
enterprise because religious understanding presupposes religious belief articles’
(p. 2)....
|
|---|