No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience

The deficiencies of the tort system in handling medical negligence claims have been apparent for a number of years. The inaccessibility of the litigation system and particular difficulties of proving medical negligence deter many potential litigants from pursuing their claim. Alternatives to the fau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Islamic University Malaysia 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/7924/1/2003_-_No-fault_compensation_for_medical_injury-_the_New_Zealand_experience.pdf
_version_ 1796875567041085440
author Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
author_facet Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
author_sort Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
collection IIUM
description The deficiencies of the tort system in handling medical negligence claims have been apparent for a number of years. The inaccessibility of the litigation system and particular difficulties of proving medical negligence deter many potential litigants from pursuing their claim. Alternatives to the fault-based system have been proposed and also implemented in some countries such as New Zealand, Sweden and Finland. These countries have adopted no-fault compensation schemes to compensate victims of medical injuries. By implementing a no-fault compensation scheme, fault becomes irrelevant, as a social insurance plan provides compensation for all personal injuries arising out of accidents, including medical mishaps, whatever may have been their cause. New Zealand was the first country to adopt a comprehensive no-fault compensation scheme for personal injury by accident. The scheme covered work and road traffic accidents, those occuring at home or during sporting activity and also, the results of medical mishaps and malpractices. The scheme's workings and development have been a source of interest for policy makers to obtain important information on how to overcome the rigours of the fault-based system. The New Zealand scheme can provide valuable lessons for a country in designing a no-fault scheme for medical injuries which is simple to run, straight forward in operation and acceptable in costs.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T22:40:34Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:7924
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T22:40:34Z
publishDate 2003
publisher International Islamic University Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:79242011-11-29T06:50:26Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/7924/ No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie K Law (General) The deficiencies of the tort system in handling medical negligence claims have been apparent for a number of years. The inaccessibility of the litigation system and particular difficulties of proving medical negligence deter many potential litigants from pursuing their claim. Alternatives to the fault-based system have been proposed and also implemented in some countries such as New Zealand, Sweden and Finland. These countries have adopted no-fault compensation schemes to compensate victims of medical injuries. By implementing a no-fault compensation scheme, fault becomes irrelevant, as a social insurance plan provides compensation for all personal injuries arising out of accidents, including medical mishaps, whatever may have been their cause. New Zealand was the first country to adopt a comprehensive no-fault compensation scheme for personal injury by accident. The scheme covered work and road traffic accidents, those occuring at home or during sporting activity and also, the results of medical mishaps and malpractices. The scheme's workings and development have been a source of interest for policy makers to obtain important information on how to overcome the rigours of the fault-based system. The New Zealand scheme can provide valuable lessons for a country in designing a no-fault scheme for medical injuries which is simple to run, straight forward in operation and acceptable in costs. International Islamic University Malaysia 2003 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/7924/1/2003_-_No-fault_compensation_for_medical_injury-_the_New_Zealand_experience.pdf Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie (2003) No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience. IIUM Law Journal, 11 (1). pp. 83-95. ISSN 0128-2530 http://rms.research.iium.edu.my/bookstore/Category/65-wwwgooglecom.aspx
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title_full No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title_fullStr No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title_full_unstemmed No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title_short No-fault compensation for medical injury: the New Zealand experience
title_sort no fault compensation for medical injury the new zealand experience
topic K Law (General)
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/7924/1/2003_-_No-fault_compensation_for_medical_injury-_the_New_Zealand_experience.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jahnkassimputerinemie nofaultcompensationformedicalinjurythenewzealandexperience