| Summary: | Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the policy implementation "domestic subsidies" for food in Indonesia and to find out how the settlement of disputes in the policy "of domestic subsidies. While the subjective purpose of this research is to increase our scientific treasures of the development of the agricultural agreement has been agreed in the WTO Indonesia.
This study uses qualitative methods as a tool of analysis. The data collected are then analyzed and analyzed diskriptif legally normative. Ways of collecting data with secondary data using primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. Analytical methods used legal materials are deductive method.
The results of this discussion is that there are three obligations on food subsidy to the criteria implemented green box, amber box and blue box. Domestic subsidies of Indonesia all the general services included in the green box criteria, and in this de minimis no more than 10% so that Indonesia does not need to reduce subsidies. Notifications Indonesia began in 1995 until the year 2001. In the WTO dispute settlement is done by consensus, the problem first appeared conducted consultations, further shaped by the dispute settlement panel Body. In the case of determination of DSB made the panel's frame of reference, composition of the panel. Further assessments conducted by the panel, and while the panel review. Report given to the parties and the DSB. Report submitted to the DSB followed-up with the verdict received or made an appeal. Conduct of the decision do next. If the parties are still objections in implementing the decision is still no way out by way of negotiated settlement or compensation, or retalisasi cross retalisasi, and there is the possibility of arbitration.
|
|---|