| Summary: | This research aims to analyze task-technology fit and the effect to perceived performance,
perceived productivity, and perceived satisfaction. 132 faculty staffs in Gadjah Mada University
Yogyakarta used as the respondents consisting of Faculty of Economics and Business, Faculty of
Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, and Faculty of Medicine.
By using Partial Least Square for testing hypotheses, it was found strong support for the
impact of task-technology fit on performance impacts and for the impact of task-technology fit
and utilization on performance impacts. The weak support of task characteristics and technology
characteristics on task-technology fit found and it was very likely caused by the unfit of the
tasks� measurement applied in this study. Small support for H2 and H4 found and it was
probably caused by the unfit concept of utilization used, that is, dependence. For each of
precursors of utilization (H6a, H6b, H6c, and H6d), there was no significant effect on utilization.
Given the situation is mandatory, that is, there is no option to utilize the technology or not, then
users have to use the technology for any tasks given to them. Precursors of utilization include
�behavioral intention� that do not predict actual behavior. The performance impact per se was
engendered by actual behavior rather than behavior intention.
Overall, it can be concluded that performance impacts (perceived performance, perceived
productivity, and perceived satisfaction) were the joint function of task-technology fit and
utilization.
|
|---|