PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA MENURUT CIVIL LAW (Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi)
This research objective is to understand the background of the reasons that The Notary is given authorize to legal advice and explore the liability of notary for legal advice in act (case study No.13.Pid.N/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst at The Court of Corruption). This research is a empirical juridical resear...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2011
|
Subjects: |
_version_ | 1797030326632972288 |
---|---|
author | , Rini Afriyanti, SH , Prof. Dr. Marsudi Triatmodjo, S.H., LL.M. |
author_facet | , Rini Afriyanti, SH , Prof. Dr. Marsudi Triatmodjo, S.H., LL.M. |
author_sort | , Rini Afriyanti, SH |
collection | UGM |
description | This research objective is to understand the background of the reasons that The
Notary is given authorize to legal advice and explore the liability of notary for legal
advice in act (case study No.13.Pid.N/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst at The Court of Corruption).
This research is a empirical juridical research, review law in history, philosophy,
comparative, legal system aspects and related with the facts occurred in society. The used
approach is the approach of legal content analysis, done legal review for legal substance,
legal system that influenced, and examinated court decision. The used data in this
research is secondary data and added primary data.
The result research express that Notary was given authorize for doing legal advice
in act, because according to Latin Notary Principle that adopted from civil law by Europe
continental countries, including Indonesia, Notary is legal expert qualified with full
knowledge. Legal Advice that Notary is given not be in contradiction with positive law.
In duty and authorize of Notary shall apply law in appropriate and might do to
rechtviding. So, Notary have preventive role in law enforcement. A Notarial Act is self
authenticating, direct and primary evidentiary status and endowed with executor force.
The liability of Notary for legal advice that given is mean that Notary have
liability on material truth of act. Even thought, notary just combine willingness parties,
Notary shall reject the request for drafting a notarial act against law. Liability of Notary
for tort could in form of: professional ethical liability, civil liability for damages, and
criminal liability. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:03:55Z |
format | Thesis |
id | oai:generic.eprints.org:88428 |
institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:03:55Z |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:884282014-08-20T02:53:35Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/88428/ PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA MENURUT CIVIL LAW (Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) , Rini Afriyanti, SH , Prof. Dr. Marsudi Triatmodjo, S.H., LL.M. ETD This research objective is to understand the background of the reasons that The Notary is given authorize to legal advice and explore the liability of notary for legal advice in act (case study No.13.Pid.N/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst at The Court of Corruption). This research is a empirical juridical research, review law in history, philosophy, comparative, legal system aspects and related with the facts occurred in society. The used approach is the approach of legal content analysis, done legal review for legal substance, legal system that influenced, and examinated court decision. The used data in this research is secondary data and added primary data. The result research express that Notary was given authorize for doing legal advice in act, because according to Latin Notary Principle that adopted from civil law by Europe continental countries, including Indonesia, Notary is legal expert qualified with full knowledge. Legal Advice that Notary is given not be in contradiction with positive law. In duty and authorize of Notary shall apply law in appropriate and might do to rechtviding. So, Notary have preventive role in law enforcement. A Notarial Act is self authenticating, direct and primary evidentiary status and endowed with executor force. The liability of Notary for legal advice that given is mean that Notary have liability on material truth of act. Even thought, notary just combine willingness parties, Notary shall reject the request for drafting a notarial act against law. Liability of Notary for tort could in form of: professional ethical liability, civil liability for damages, and criminal liability. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2011 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Rini Afriyanti, SH and , Prof. Dr. Marsudi Triatmodjo, S.H., LL.M. (2011) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA MENURUT CIVIL LAW (Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=50577 |
spellingShingle | ETD , Rini Afriyanti, SH , Prof. Dr. Marsudi Triatmodjo, S.H., LL.M. PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA MENURUT CIVIL LAW (Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA
MENURUT CIVIL LAW
(Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst
di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title_full | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA
MENURUT CIVIL LAW
(Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst
di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title_fullStr | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA
MENURUT CIVIL LAW
(Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst
di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title_full_unstemmed | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA
MENURUT CIVIL LAW
(Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst
di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title_short | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA
MENURUT CIVIL LAW
(Studi Perkara No. 13.Pid.B/TPK/2007/PN.Jkt.Pst
di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) |
title_sort | pertanggungjawaban notaris terhadap penyuluhan hukum dalam pembuatan akta menurut civil law studi perkara no 13 pid b tpk 2007 pn jkt pst di pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi |
topic | ETD |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riniafriyantish pertanggungjawabannotaristerhadappenyuluhanhukumdalampembuatanaktamenurutcivillawstudiperkarano13pidbtpk2007pnjktpstdipengadilantindakpidanakorupsi AT profdrmarsuditriatmodjoshllm pertanggungjawabannotaristerhadappenyuluhanhukumdalampembuatanaktamenurutcivillawstudiperkarano13pidbtpk2007pnjktpstdipengadilantindakpidanakorupsi |