| Summary: | This study discusses to hit iron sand mining wisdom policy formulation
process at regency bima that is SK Regent Bima number 406/2004 about KP iron
sand mineral exploitation to PT. JMK, and SK Regent Bima number 407/2004
about KP iron sand mineral exploitation to PT. Indomining. watchfulness is
important done because based in iron sand mining problem at Regency Bima in
the execution gets denial from society. Temporary at one government side exactly
permanent carry out policy meants, even prolong permission KP iron sand to
second company pt. jmk and pt. indomining. this watchfulness focus in wisdom
maker process hits iron sand mineral mining authority licensing at Regency Bima.
This watchfulness aims to detect (1) to how how does iron sand mining
wisdom formulation process at Regency Bima in the form of SK regent bima
number 406/2004 about KP iron sand mineral exploitation to PT. JMK, and SK
Regent Bima number 407 2004 about kp iron sand mineral exploitation to PT.
Indomining, and (2) how does society participation in course of policy
formulation.
This watchfulness uses qualitative descriptive method. primary data and
secondary data is got from data source among others informant, and related
document. data taken to pass observation, interview, with documentation at field
towards policy second maker meants.
In iron sand mining wisdom formulation at regency bima this known
stakeholders in concerned still has bureaucrat series internal (executive) with not
yet nudge every element related to second wisdom formulation SK number 406
and 407/2004 hit SK permission KP iron sand. Belong in this case the minimum
society participation, is not involved in second formulation stage sk regent
meants. this iron sand mining wisdom is not yet mengakomodasi all interest
various society element. Finally in policy implementation stage get denial from
society, because the policy has negative impact to environment and society doesn't
get benefit from mine activity meants.
|
|---|