KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO

Mindanao�s Conflict has been one of conflicts that notoriously perpetuated and unresolved. Negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996 � between the government of the Philippines under Fidel Ramos�s administrative regime and MNLF with the leadership of Nur Misuari � has been presumably,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si., , Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2011
Subjects:
ETD
_version_ 1826043651093954560
author , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si.
, Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed
author_facet , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si.
, Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed
author_sort , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si.
collection UGM
description Mindanao�s Conflict has been one of conflicts that notoriously perpetuated and unresolved. Negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996 � between the government of the Philippines under Fidel Ramos�s administrative regime and MNLF with the leadership of Nur Misuari � has been presumably, by many scholars, a regime that acquainted with the features of resolving the conflict of Mindanao. Nevertheless, such negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996 remains failed to overcome the Mindanao�s conflict. In this dissertational research, the writer exemplified instrumentalist approach in order to comprehensively analyze underlying factors of the negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996. Explaining the influential features of negotiation instrumentation to the regime�s incompetency in the context of conflict resolution in Mindanao, the writer argues that negotiation instrumentation has been understood as consequential strategy to overcome the problematic of actor�s legitimacy and conflict of Mindanao simultaneously. The negotiation instrumentation by particular actors, however, gives shape to the option of the negotiation regime and the compromising notion focusing more on underscoring the resolution of actors problematic rather than the deep-rooted problems of the Mindanao�s conflict. The research used qualitative research methodology with case study as the ultimate strategy. Technique of collecting data was undertaken with in-depth interview to several stakeholders in Mindanao�s conflict, negotiation practitioners as well as previous researchers whose competencies and specializations in this discourse. Besides, the research also underscored a series of interpretations of numerous documentations during negotiation process such as Tripoli Agreement 1976, Jeddah Accord 1987, Final Peace Agreement 1996, and Republic Act 9045.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T22:07:08Z
format Thesis
id oai:generic.eprints.org:89398
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T22:07:08Z
publishDate 2011
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:893982014-08-20T02:54:01Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/89398/ KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si. , Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed ETD Mindanao�s Conflict has been one of conflicts that notoriously perpetuated and unresolved. Negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996 � between the government of the Philippines under Fidel Ramos�s administrative regime and MNLF with the leadership of Nur Misuari � has been presumably, by many scholars, a regime that acquainted with the features of resolving the conflict of Mindanao. Nevertheless, such negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996 remains failed to overcome the Mindanao�s conflict. In this dissertational research, the writer exemplified instrumentalist approach in order to comprehensively analyze underlying factors of the negotiation regime of Final Peace Agreement 1996. Explaining the influential features of negotiation instrumentation to the regime�s incompetency in the context of conflict resolution in Mindanao, the writer argues that negotiation instrumentation has been understood as consequential strategy to overcome the problematic of actor�s legitimacy and conflict of Mindanao simultaneously. The negotiation instrumentation by particular actors, however, gives shape to the option of the negotiation regime and the compromising notion focusing more on underscoring the resolution of actors problematic rather than the deep-rooted problems of the Mindanao�s conflict. The research used qualitative research methodology with case study as the ultimate strategy. Technique of collecting data was undertaken with in-depth interview to several stakeholders in Mindanao�s conflict, negotiation practitioners as well as previous researchers whose competencies and specializations in this discourse. Besides, the research also underscored a series of interpretations of numerous documentations during negotiation process such as Tripoli Agreement 1976, Jeddah Accord 1987, Final Peace Agreement 1996, and Republic Act 9045. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2011 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si. and , Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed (2011) KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=51673
spellingShingle ETD
, Surwandono, S.Sos.,M.Si.
, Prof. Dr. Mohtar Mas'oed
KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title_full KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title_fullStr KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title_full_unstemmed KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title_short KEGAGALAN REGIME NEGOSIASI FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT 1996 DALAM PELEMBAGAAN PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK MINDANAO
title_sort kegagalan regime negosiasi final peace agreement 1996 dalam pelembagaan penyelesaian konflik mindanao
topic ETD
work_keys_str_mv AT surwandonossosmsi kegagalanregimenegosiasifinalpeaceagreement1996dalampelembagaanpenyelesaiankonflikmindanao
AT profdrmohtarmasoed kegagalanregimenegosiasifinalpeaceagreement1996dalampelembagaanpenyelesaiankonflikmindanao