| Summary: | Village Allocation Fund is a manifestation of the fulfillment of the village to
organize village autonomy. This was done so that the village can grow and follow the
growth that comes from the village itself on the basis of diversity, participation,
genuine autonomy, democratization, and empowerment. Based on the understanding
of ADD, then in doing the necessary planning and implementation of ADD
participation, transparency, accountability and equality of all parties involved in the
policy is good policy makers, policy implementers and target groups. This is done to
create a good governance. This study aims to determine the dynamics in the process of
planning and implementation with ADD, based on the principles of participation,
transparency, accountability, and equality made by the village of Maba District,
Marasipno Village, East Halmahera Regency.
This study is a qualitative research method and is equipped with a descriptive
analysis of secondary data. Where is the procedure penilitian qualitative research that
produces descriptive data in the form of words written or spoken of people and
behaviors that can be observed. The author merged observation techniques, interviews,
and documentation. Observations conducted in the Village Marasipno, and
documentation techniques performed to explore secondary data related to research.
Data obtained from both techniques were then deepened through interviews with
informants.
The results showed that the process of planning and implementation of the
Allocation Funds Marasipno Village in the village is still very far from the principles
of management of the Village Fund Allocation. No nets Allocation Fund management
principles Village of the planning stages to implementation can be seen from the lack
of participation, transparency, accountability and equality of the public with an interest
in the management of the Village in the Village Fund Allocation Marasipno.
Disharmony between the planning and implementation in the management of the
Village Fund Allocation is also caused due to lack of awareness of the importance of
these policies as well as the apathy of the village government officials. From the
research the author gives the following recommendations: 1). Need an evaluation of
village expansion of the government district. The same happens with the Village
Marasipno, because based on the findings in the field that the absence of governance
in the village. 2). In the framework of understanding about the management of the
Village Fund Allocation, it is necessary to the holding of socialization often guide the
implementation of the decree concerning the Village Fund Allocation. and required
supervision or assistance from related offices for planning and implementing the
Village Fund Allocation. 3). The necessity of understanding the public that the Village
Fund Allocation is their right. Since the purpose of this kebiajkan is prospering rural
community. 4). And to avoid the occurrence of abuse in applying or in carrying out the
policy of ADD, it takes a strong institutional presence of the village, so the funds can
be managed properly. Strong institutional villages can ensure sustainability of ADD
and ADD-funded programs.
|
|---|