POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL
Indonesia, as a multicultural country, necessitates space of co-existence which gives recognition to the various identity-forming it multiculturality. In fact, in many state policy, since the colonial government until the New Order government, political prominence monocultural, solely for the sake o...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2011
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826045150019715072 |
|---|---|
| author | , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. , Prof. Dr. Warsito Utomo, |
| author_facet | , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. , Prof. Dr. Warsito Utomo, |
| author_sort | , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Indonesia, as a multicultural country, necessitates space of co-existence
which gives recognition to the various identity-forming it multiculturality. In fact, in
many state policy, since the colonial government until the New Order government,
political prominence monocultural, solely for the sake of stability and social
integration. Policies with the tendencies in politics monoculturalism, in addition to
narrowing the space between the elements of multicultural coexistence, adding to
the natural potential of conflict with political weight, especially monocultural
policies are instrumented with centralism and authoritarianism. A combination of
monocultural policies containing misrecognition with the inability of the state escort
policy is an important variable in a variety of multicultural or multiethnic conflicts,
such as in Kalimantan, which has happened dozens of times, including in Sampit
which became the locus as well as the object of this research.
From the background can be thesisized that public policy that includes
political recognition can be a fundamental and comprehensive solution for
settlement of inter-ethnic conflict in Kalimantan, especially East Kotawaringin
Sampit. Thesis can be broken down into different research question. 1) How is the
construction of political principles of recognition in the Local Regulation No. 5 of
2004 on the Handling of Population Impact of Conflict in Sampit, Kotim? 2) How is
the relation between regional regulation with the effort of handling conflict? 3) How
is the implementation of such local regulation in overcoming inter-ethnic conflict in
a multicultural society and to preserve a peaceful atmosphere ?
This study used a qualitative approach presented in the case study approach,
conducted an intensive, detailed and profound of an organism, institution or through
an observation of certain symptoms to generate descriptive data, i.e. data that form
of words written or spoken of the people and observed behavior.
The results showed: Local Kotim No. 5 of 2004 already contained the
political principles of recognition in a very fundamental nature of the right to live in
peace and living in Sampit for the citizens of Madura as ethnic minorities and the
disadvantaged position. These rights are recognized by the citizens of the ethnic
majority ethnic Dayak to return to Sampit and stayed there all obey the law and
willing to participate have not uphold the philosophy of bahadat and "where there
stepped earth upheld the sky." While ethnic Dayak indigenous ethnic recognized
position as a social order and civic and customary traditions accepted and
maintained, and requires each person who comes to respect and uphold these
traditions insofar as the social problem and not a religious ritual.
The law is able to resolve conflicts in the process of developing documents
is unique. The crucial point in the policy cycle of ethnic conflict lies in the policy
formulation stage, where the construction of legal provisions that would bind both
parties to a conflict is determined. Regulations that are bottom-up and participatory
formulation stage since proved effective in the implementation stage. In the context
Kotim law, the law is really a formalization of the consensus reached internal
consensus among ethnic-specific prior Dayak and Madurese as a party to the
conflict, enforcement have given formal judicial certainty to ensure the protection of
each party to the conflict to peace, arrangements contained in it are in compliance
with demands to resolve remaining problems that arise after the bloody riots in
2001. It encourages the parties are in a refugee to return to Sampit dare to live
together again with people as before the conflict. Actually, law is a formulation that
has been the understanding between the parties to respect each other, give and
receive from the demands of the rights and obligations of each party. However, the
law is absolutely necessary to give formal legal guarantee to every party to comply
with such understanding.
Local Policy Implementation is going well and gradually be able to
harmonize and multikulutral mutietnik citizens so that in turn is able mempreservasi
atmosphere of peace. Ethnic conflict in Sampit relatively comprehensively finished
without leaving a big issue that distinguishes the handling of inter-ethnic conflicts in
other places such as in Sambas
From the findings of this study, can be taken several important propositions:
1) the crucial point in the policy cycle of ethnic conflict lies in the policy
formulation stage, where the construction of legal provisions that would bind both
parties to a conflict is determined. Regulations that are bottom-up and participatory
formulation stage since proved effective in the implementation stage. 2) political
monocultural even if supported by a great power will not work to unite a
multicultural society, both in terms of ethnicity, belief, practice beliefs, and
lifestyles, and even tended to bury a hidden conflict time can be open and armed
conflict. Hence politics is the answer to the diversity multicultural national identity
and state of Indonesia. 3) In a multicultural society, political recognition is the main
instrument to provide guarantees for the existence and the realization of the living
expression of each of the identity of both large and small, major or minor. 4)
Political recognition must be realized or included in a public policy (government or
state), so that each party obtain legal certainty. 5) In preparing a public policy
concerning inter-group relations in a multicultural society required the participation
of each group, so the product of public policy can be understood and accepted by all
groups. 6) central government policy intervention in resolving inter-ethnic conflicts
and other multicultural conflict is not positively correlated with the settlement of the
conflict. Initiative and a large portion of local government such as in Kotim proven
show a more permanent solution to the conflict, at least when compared with a
similar conflict in Sambas, Ambon and Poso. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:32:43Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:97398 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:32:43Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:973982016-03-04T08:50:27Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/97398/ POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. , Prof. Dr. Warsito Utomo, ETD Indonesia, as a multicultural country, necessitates space of co-existence which gives recognition to the various identity-forming it multiculturality. In fact, in many state policy, since the colonial government until the New Order government, political prominence monocultural, solely for the sake of stability and social integration. Policies with the tendencies in politics monoculturalism, in addition to narrowing the space between the elements of multicultural coexistence, adding to the natural potential of conflict with political weight, especially monocultural policies are instrumented with centralism and authoritarianism. A combination of monocultural policies containing misrecognition with the inability of the state escort policy is an important variable in a variety of multicultural or multiethnic conflicts, such as in Kalimantan, which has happened dozens of times, including in Sampit which became the locus as well as the object of this research. From the background can be thesisized that public policy that includes political recognition can be a fundamental and comprehensive solution for settlement of inter-ethnic conflict in Kalimantan, especially East Kotawaringin Sampit. Thesis can be broken down into different research question. 1) How is the construction of political principles of recognition in the Local Regulation No. 5 of 2004 on the Handling of Population Impact of Conflict in Sampit, Kotim? 2) How is the relation between regional regulation with the effort of handling conflict? 3) How is the implementation of such local regulation in overcoming inter-ethnic conflict in a multicultural society and to preserve a peaceful atmosphere ? This study used a qualitative approach presented in the case study approach, conducted an intensive, detailed and profound of an organism, institution or through an observation of certain symptoms to generate descriptive data, i.e. data that form of words written or spoken of the people and observed behavior. The results showed: Local Kotim No. 5 of 2004 already contained the political principles of recognition in a very fundamental nature of the right to live in peace and living in Sampit for the citizens of Madura as ethnic minorities and the disadvantaged position. These rights are recognized by the citizens of the ethnic majority ethnic Dayak to return to Sampit and stayed there all obey the law and willing to participate have not uphold the philosophy of bahadat and "where there stepped earth upheld the sky." While ethnic Dayak indigenous ethnic recognized position as a social order and civic and customary traditions accepted and maintained, and requires each person who comes to respect and uphold these traditions insofar as the social problem and not a religious ritual. The law is able to resolve conflicts in the process of developing documents is unique. The crucial point in the policy cycle of ethnic conflict lies in the policy formulation stage, where the construction of legal provisions that would bind both parties to a conflict is determined. Regulations that are bottom-up and participatory formulation stage since proved effective in the implementation stage. In the context Kotim law, the law is really a formalization of the consensus reached internal consensus among ethnic-specific prior Dayak and Madurese as a party to the conflict, enforcement have given formal judicial certainty to ensure the protection of each party to the conflict to peace, arrangements contained in it are in compliance with demands to resolve remaining problems that arise after the bloody riots in 2001. It encourages the parties are in a refugee to return to Sampit dare to live together again with people as before the conflict. Actually, law is a formulation that has been the understanding between the parties to respect each other, give and receive from the demands of the rights and obligations of each party. However, the law is absolutely necessary to give formal legal guarantee to every party to comply with such understanding. Local Policy Implementation is going well and gradually be able to harmonize and multikulutral mutietnik citizens so that in turn is able mempreservasi atmosphere of peace. Ethnic conflict in Sampit relatively comprehensively finished without leaving a big issue that distinguishes the handling of inter-ethnic conflicts in other places such as in Sambas From the findings of this study, can be taken several important propositions: 1) the crucial point in the policy cycle of ethnic conflict lies in the policy formulation stage, where the construction of legal provisions that would bind both parties to a conflict is determined. Regulations that are bottom-up and participatory formulation stage since proved effective in the implementation stage. 2) political monocultural even if supported by a great power will not work to unite a multicultural society, both in terms of ethnicity, belief, practice beliefs, and lifestyles, and even tended to bury a hidden conflict time can be open and armed conflict. Hence politics is the answer to the diversity multicultural national identity and state of Indonesia. 3) In a multicultural society, political recognition is the main instrument to provide guarantees for the existence and the realization of the living expression of each of the identity of both large and small, major or minor. 4) Political recognition must be realized or included in a public policy (government or state), so that each party obtain legal certainty. 5) In preparing a public policy concerning inter-group relations in a multicultural society required the participation of each group, so the product of public policy can be understood and accepted by all groups. 6) central government policy intervention in resolving inter-ethnic conflicts and other multicultural conflict is not positively correlated with the settlement of the conflict. Initiative and a large portion of local government such as in Kotim proven show a more permanent solution to the conflict, at least when compared with a similar conflict in Sambas, Ambon and Poso. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2011 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. and , Prof. Dr. Warsito Utomo, (2011) POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=50988 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Suharno, S.Pd.,M.Si. , Prof. Dr. Warsito Utomo, POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTURAL |
| title | POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG
PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT
MULTIKULTURAL |
| title_full | POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG
PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT
MULTIKULTURAL |
| title_fullStr | POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG
PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT
MULTIKULTURAL |
| title_full_unstemmed | POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG
PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT
MULTIKULTURAL |
| title_short | POLITIK REKOGNISI DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG
PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI DALAM MASYARAKAT
MULTIKULTURAL |
| title_sort | politik rekognisi dalam peraturan daerah tentang penyelesaian konflik di dalam masyarakat multikultural |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT suharnospdmsi politikrekognisidalamperaturandaerahtentangpenyelesaiankonflikdidalammasyarakatmultikultural AT profdrwarsitoutomo politikrekognisidalamperaturandaerahtentangpenyelesaiankonflikdidalammasyarakatmultikultural |