ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT: DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES
Yogyakarta � Magelang track was closed in 1976. Currently, the ministry of transportation is reviewing reactivated possibilities to give this track its second chance. The research is aimed to provide some alternative routes between Yogyakarta-Magelang using MCA (Multi Criteria Analysis). MCA�s k...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826045238707224576 |
|---|---|
| author | , SAFRILAH , Prof. Ir. Sigit Priyanto M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| author_facet | , SAFRILAH , Prof. Ir. Sigit Priyanto M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| author_sort | , SAFRILAH |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Yogyakarta � Magelang track was closed in 1976. Currently, the ministry of
transportation is reviewing reactivated possibilities to give this track its second chance.
The research is aimed to provide some alternative routes between Yogyakarta-Magelang
using MCA (Multi Criteria Analysis). MCA�s key feature is its ability to offers a number
of ways of aggregating the data on individual criteria to provide indicators of the overall
performance of options.
Three alternative routes was decided with it�s each goal. First route crossing along
the old track, second route connecting busy areas between Yogyakarta � Magelang, and
the last alternative route heading straight to Borobudur Temple. Each route was analyzed
with MCA method, comparing each route by scoring and weighting.
Based on the analysis results, for quantitative criteria ( Construction cost,
operational cost, land acquisition, and railway length) scoring and weighting given
based on calculation using autocad civil 3D or simple Microsoft excel, and for qualitative
criteria (demand, accessibility, landscape, social effect, and others) scoring and
weighting given based on scale 1 � 5. And from the analysis using MCA, the third route
has the highest weight, but weak in qualitative criteria and also has the highest cost. So
the chosen route was the second route, with the best qualitative assessment and also
cheap in quantitative assessment |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:34:01Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:97826 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:34:01Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:978262016-03-04T08:48:41Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/97826/ ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT: DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES , SAFRILAH , Prof. Ir. Sigit Priyanto M.Sc., Ph.D. ETD Yogyakarta � Magelang track was closed in 1976. Currently, the ministry of transportation is reviewing reactivated possibilities to give this track its second chance. The research is aimed to provide some alternative routes between Yogyakarta-Magelang using MCA (Multi Criteria Analysis). MCA�s key feature is its ability to offers a number of ways of aggregating the data on individual criteria to provide indicators of the overall performance of options. Three alternative routes was decided with it�s each goal. First route crossing along the old track, second route connecting busy areas between Yogyakarta � Magelang, and the last alternative route heading straight to Borobudur Temple. Each route was analyzed with MCA method, comparing each route by scoring and weighting. Based on the analysis results, for quantitative criteria ( Construction cost, operational cost, land acquisition, and railway length) scoring and weighting given based on calculation using autocad civil 3D or simple Microsoft excel, and for qualitative criteria (demand, accessibility, landscape, social effect, and others) scoring and weighting given based on scale 1 � 5. And from the analysis using MCA, the third route has the highest weight, but weak in qualitative criteria and also has the highest cost. So the chosen route was the second route, with the best qualitative assessment and also cheap in quantitative assessment [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , SAFRILAH and , Prof. Ir. Sigit Priyanto M.Sc., Ph.D. (2012) ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT: DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53732 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , SAFRILAH , Prof. Ir. Sigit Priyanto M.Sc., Ph.D. ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT: DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title | ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY
DEVELOPMENT:
DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title_full | ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY
DEVELOPMENT:
DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title_fullStr | ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY
DEVELOPMENT:
DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title_full_unstemmed | ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY
DEVELOPMENT:
DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title_short | ROUTE ALTERNATIVE FOR YOGYAKARTA�S RAILWAY
DEVELOPMENT:
DESIGN CHOICE AND POSSIBILITIES |
| title_sort | route alternative for yogyakartaa��s railway development design choice and possibilities |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT safrilah routealternativeforyogyakartaasrailwaydevelopmentdesignchoiceandpossibilities AT profirsigitpriyantomscphd routealternativeforyogyakartaasrailwaydevelopmentdesignchoiceandpossibilities |