| Summary: | Mutual funds experienced positive growth in 2010, both conventional and
Islamic mutual funds. However, the development of Islamic mutual funds are
considered slow. This is because lack of socialization sharia mutual funds. Many
studies try to compare which one is better between conventional mutual funds with
sharia. However, this study uses the size of Treynor, Sharpe and Jensen. This study
attempts to use RMAR and RDIV methods which are modification of Treynor
measure, Sharpe and Jensen.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether there are significant
performance differences between conventional mutual funds with sharia. Thus, the
working hypothesis is that there are significant differences between conventional and
Islamic mutual funds. Sampling frame in this study took eight conventional mutual
funds and mutual funds sharia. Statistical tests in this study using Wilcoxon test.
The results of Wilcoxon test showed significant differences between
conventional mutual funds with sharia. From the analysis and the Wilcoxon test was
also seen that the performance of Islamic mutual funds are better than conventional.
|
|---|