| Summary: | The policy of local partition in 2003 has actually caused significant change
in asset management system in Central Halmahera Regency due to the transfer of
regency�s capital from Soasio to Weda, the decreased width of territory, the
redistribution of asset, the mutation of civil servants in a large number of 2.414
people, and the minimum of regional infrastructures. The condition led to the
more comprehensive management of development, particularly in infrastructures
by reconstructing those in favor of governmental and public service activities. The
focus on infrastructure development ignored the importance of best asset
management. As a consequence, in the five last years of 2006-2010, the Financial
Inspection Board of the Republic of Indonesia consecutively stated disclaimer
opinions on the Financial Statement of Local Government of Central Halmahera
Regency due to, among others, the low performance of asset management.
Based on the phenomenon, this study focuses on the determination of
some key factors influencing the asset management of land and real estate. The
factors are reconstructed from the combination of asset management concepts in
corporate context that were adapted into public sector. The study also analyzies
the roles of management at each level in improvement of the performance of asset
management particularly land and real estate. Data were collected by a survey
technique with 62 respondents as governmental apparatuses closely related to the
authority of local asset management, which were determined by a purposive
sampling technique.
By the methodology of Expectation-Perception-Importance (EPI) and the
Importance Performance Analysis (IPA), result of the study indicates that the key
factors were analyzed on the basis of respondents� answer in three perspectives,
i.e. expectation, perception, and importance, to finally determine priority in
improving the performance of land and real estate management. Assessment on
perception of the performance of land and real estate management based on
management�s role at each level was done by the Kruskal Wallis�s one-way
analysis of variance.
Result of the analysis indicates that among the key factors influencing the
performance of land and real estate management, the perception of performance
was generally lower than its expectation and its importance. The weaknesses
found in Local Government of Central Halmahera Regency were related to
information system, legality, control, assessment, and optimization with lowest
scores, so the aspects should be paid attention as the highest priorities to be
handled. Result of the Kruskal Wallis�s analysis of variance shows that there was
a significant difference between perceptions of the performance of asset
management based on the roles of each management level.
|
|---|