| Summary: | This study examines the influence of cultural decision-Papuas People
Assembly (MRP) as a material consideration in determining and implementing the
regional administration in terms of empowerment, protection and favor of
indigenous Papuas in the context of the Act No. 21 of 2001 regarding Special
Autonomy for the Papua�s Province as amended by the Act No.35 of 2008 on Special
Autonomy for Papua and West Papua Province, aims to examine the extent to which
local governments take policy and how the effectiveness of its policies to the
authority delegated by referring to the decision. In the construction of theoretical
perspective, departing from the concept of state authority in the country, especially
the relationship of unity with the position of MRP as a new institution in the local
political superstructure.
The normative legal research using juridical approaches, and historically,
the application tailored to the needs. These results indicate that the decision of the
Papuas People Assembly doesn�t affect the government policy which leads to the
protection, empowerment and alignments of the indigenous Papuans, because of
most the material that is clearly making a process delegation of law before the
decision was made without the involvement of MRP in 2008 because there is no legal
instrument on the mechanism of inter-institutional superstructure while the local
government after the MRP's decision in 2010 and 2011 cannot implement the
regulations that have been made and other materials for regulatory policy it also the
decision was made in the same time with a political agenda such as the election of
members of the MRP and the election of Governor.
The results of research also showed that in addition to regulatory
arrangements, there are a number of other factors being the cause of the
ineffectiveness of the performance of local government.
|
|---|