GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010
Theoretically, in general debitor owning the problem of ability to fulfill its obligation pay for debt can go through various solution alternative. In the case of debitor don't have asset or finance which enough as as a last resort is all creditor go through resolving through regulation of bank...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826045667742580736 |
|---|---|
| author | , Rusli Effendi, SH , Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., M.S. |
| author_facet | , Rusli Effendi, SH , Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., M.S. |
| author_sort | , Rusli Effendi, SH |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Theoretically, in general debitor owning the problem of ability to fulfill its
obligation pay for debt can go through various solution alternative. In the case of
debitor don't have asset or finance which enough as as a last resort is all creditor go
through resolving through regulation of bankrupt, by apply statement of bankrupt to
Justice of Commercial in its territory of jurisdiction.
In practice by dozens emerge problems after debitor fallen by bankrupt
decision. One of the example of is problems between curator with creditor, specially
separatist creditor. In general problems between curator with separatist creditor is to
centre around execution execute guarantee object of fiducia property of bankrupt
debitor.
Target of writer perform a this research is to know and analyse in
perpectively of law of execution execute guarantee object of fidusia property of
bankrupt debitor by separatist creditor of P.T. Bank Mega Tbk.
Research method the used is method of juridical-normative by using three
approach, that is approach of law, approach of case, and concept intention.
Specification of research the used is analytical descriptive. Source of data weared by
is data of secondary, covering materials punish primary, materials punish secondary,
and tertiary law materials.
Pursuant to result of research, hence can be concluded as follows. 1. With
base at Section 55 sentence (1) and Clarification of Section 31 sentence (1) Code of
No. 37 Year 2004 and also Section 27 Code of No. 42 Year 1999 following its
clarification, hence can be concluded, that execution execute guarantee object of
fiducia property of bankrupt debitor conducted by KPKNL Port Float pursuant to
stipulating of District Court Of Tanjungkarang on request separatist creditor of P.T.
Bank Mega Tbk. is do not illegal, lawful for the reason. 2. Action Sued by I and
action Sued by II cannot is categorized as deed contempt of court as arranged in
Section 1365 civil code. 3. In perpective of factie judex in dropping its decision is to
base at rule of Section 34 Code of No. 34 Year 2004, while is in perspective of juris
judex in dropping its decision is to base at rule of Section 55 sentence (1) and
Clarification of Section 31 sentence (1) Code of No. 37 year 2004, and also Section
27 Code of No. 42 Year 1999. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:40:38Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:99924 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:40:38Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:999242016-03-04T08:48:41Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99924/ GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 , Rusli Effendi, SH , Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., M.S. ETD Theoretically, in general debitor owning the problem of ability to fulfill its obligation pay for debt can go through various solution alternative. In the case of debitor don't have asset or finance which enough as as a last resort is all creditor go through resolving through regulation of bankrupt, by apply statement of bankrupt to Justice of Commercial in its territory of jurisdiction. In practice by dozens emerge problems after debitor fallen by bankrupt decision. One of the example of is problems between curator with creditor, specially separatist creditor. In general problems between curator with separatist creditor is to centre around execution execute guarantee object of fiducia property of bankrupt debitor. Target of writer perform a this research is to know and analyse in perpectively of law of execution execute guarantee object of fidusia property of bankrupt debitor by separatist creditor of P.T. Bank Mega Tbk. Research method the used is method of juridical-normative by using three approach, that is approach of law, approach of case, and concept intention. Specification of research the used is analytical descriptive. Source of data weared by is data of secondary, covering materials punish primary, materials punish secondary, and tertiary law materials. Pursuant to result of research, hence can be concluded as follows. 1. With base at Section 55 sentence (1) and Clarification of Section 31 sentence (1) Code of No. 37 Year 2004 and also Section 27 Code of No. 42 Year 1999 following its clarification, hence can be concluded, that execution execute guarantee object of fiducia property of bankrupt debitor conducted by KPKNL Port Float pursuant to stipulating of District Court Of Tanjungkarang on request separatist creditor of P.T. Bank Mega Tbk. is do not illegal, lawful for the reason. 2. Action Sued by I and action Sued by II cannot is categorized as deed contempt of court as arranged in Section 1365 civil code. 3. In perpective of factie judex in dropping its decision is to base at rule of Section 34 Code of No. 34 Year 2004, while is in perspective of juris judex in dropping its decision is to base at rule of Section 55 sentence (1) and Clarification of Section 31 sentence (1) Code of No. 37 year 2004, and also Section 27 Code of No. 42 Year 1999. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Rusli Effendi, SH and , Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., M.S. (2012) GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=55696 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Rusli Effendi, SH , Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., M.S. GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title | GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title_full | GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title_fullStr | GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title_full_unstemmed | GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title_short | GUGATAN TIM KURATOR ATAS PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA MILIK DEBITUR PAILIT LEH KREDITUR SEPARATIS. DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 TANGGAL 11 MEI 2010 |
| title_sort | gugatan tim kurator atas pelaksanaan eksekusi obyek jaminan fiducia milik debitur pailit leh kreditur separatis ditinjau dari perspektif hukum studi kasus putusan mahkamah agung no 306 k pdt sus 2010 tanggal 11 mei 2010 |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ruslieffendish gugatantimkuratorataspelaksanaaneksekusiobyekjaminanfiduciamilikdebiturpailitlehkrediturseparatisditinjaudariperspektifhukumstudikasusputusanmahkamahagungno306kpdtsus2010tanggal11mei2010 AT profdrnindyopramonoshms gugatantimkuratorataspelaksanaaneksekusiobyekjaminanfiduciamilikdebiturpailitlehkrediturseparatisditinjaudariperspektifhukumstudikasusputusanmahkamahagungno306kpdtsus2010tanggal11mei2010 |