| Summary: | The first study objective was to find the data used to compile a thesis to
complete one of the conditions obtained his Master of Law Master of Law at the
University of Gadjah Mada, the second is to determine the ratio of construction
against the law in Law No.11 Year 2008 on Information and Transactions compared
with the electronic book III Civil Code, and the third is to find out how sanctions
against those who committed acts against the law in the sale and purchase transactions
through the internet (e-commerce) as well as knowing the government's role in
facilitating information and electronic transactions.
The data used in this study were primary and secondary data collected through
field research and library research. Means of collecting data is a study of the
document. Subject of research by the authors is the parties who make a purchase
agreement through internet media.
Unlawful acts (Onrechtmatigedaad) as defined in Article 1365 Civil Code
which states that: "Any unlawful act, which brings harm to another person, require the
person who published the loss was his fault, replace the losses." Sanctions against the
party who did against the law in the sale and purchase transactions through the
internet (e-commerce) is being applied for compensation in a lawsuit in haldengan
intentionally and without right to disseminate false and misleading news that resulted
in the loss of consumers in electronic transactions Article 28 paragraph 1 of Law
No.11 year RI 2008 on information and Electronic Transactions can be made to
replace the losses have been suffered, the cost-recovery fee for public order and moral
norms that have been disrupted and repair costs for damage suffered as a direct result
of Defendants unlawful conduct is in accordance with Article 45, paragraph 2 of Law
ITE any person who meets the elements referred to in Article 28 paragraph 1 or
paragraph 2 shall be punished with imprisonment of 6 (six) years and / or a fine of not
more Rp.1.000.000.000, - (one billion rupiah ) .. The role of government to protect the
public interest of any kind of disturbance as a result Any use of Electronic
Information and Electronic Transaction that disrupt public order, in accordance with
the provisions of legislation. This section does not correspond to reality because there
are igniter use of electronic information that could disrupt public order that means the
government has not protected the public interest.
|
|---|