Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% a...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA)
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf |
| _version_ | 1796900098707292160 |
|---|---|
| author | Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan |
| author_facet | Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan |
| author_sort | Ibrahim, Anas |
| collection | UITM |
| description | This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% and 9% of weight of dry peat soils. Compressive strength of stabilized peat soil under different mixtures
process were evaluated by unconfined compressive stress test (UCT), and the performance of this admixture will be compared. Three different curing times are considered, namely; immediate, 3 days and 7 days curing period. Lime slurry method for peat soil stabilization is more effective compared to lime powder admixture. Results obtained from the tests shown that the Unconfined Compressive Strength values under lime slurry were increased with the increasing lime percentage and longer curing time period. The maximum improvement was 950 % under lime slurry and for 7 days curing period compared to the untreated peat soils. However the unconfined compressive strength for lime powder decreases around 60% to 63% with the increment of curing period. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T01:30:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:14860 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi MARA |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T01:30:34Z |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA) |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:148602016-10-06T01:42:06Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/ Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] esteem Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% and 9% of weight of dry peat soils. Compressive strength of stabilized peat soil under different mixtures process were evaluated by unconfined compressive stress test (UCT), and the performance of this admixture will be compared. Three different curing times are considered, namely; immediate, 3 days and 7 days curing period. Lime slurry method for peat soil stabilization is more effective compared to lime powder admixture. Results obtained from the tests shown that the Unconfined Compressive Strength values under lime slurry were increased with the increasing lime percentage and longer curing time period. The maximum improvement was 950 % under lime slurry and for 7 days curing period compared to the untreated peat soils. However the unconfined compressive strength for lime powder decreases around 60% to 63% with the increment of curing period. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA) 2007 Article PeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]. (2007) ESTEEM Academic Journal <https://ir.uitm.edu.my/view/publication/ESTEEM_Academic_Journal/>, 3. pp. 87-100. ISSN 1675-7939 https://uppp.uitm.edu.my |
| spellingShingle | Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title | Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title_full | Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title_short | Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] |
| title_sort | comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization anas ibrahim et al |
| topic | Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics |
| url | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimanas comparisonbetweenhydratedlimedrypowderandslurryonpeatsoilstabilizationanasibrahimetal AT abdullahmuhammadsofian comparisonbetweenhydratedlimedrypowderandslurryonpeatsoilstabilizationanasibrahimetal AT jamalludindamanhuri comparisonbetweenhydratedlimedrypowderandslurryonpeatsoilstabilizationanasibrahimetal AT apomustan comparisonbetweenhydratedlimedrypowderandslurryonpeatsoilstabilizationanasibrahimetal |