ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim

With the evolution of time and technological devices, defamatory matter today has acquired itself a more 'global presence' in which it is capable of reaching mass numbers of people. This research is regarding Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability for online defamation. Despite the fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua, Noh, Nurul Asyikin, Ibrahim, Nurul Shakila
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31612/1/31612.pdf
_version_ 1825737411309600768
author Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua
Noh, Nurul Asyikin
Ibrahim, Nurul Shakila
author_facet Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua
Noh, Nurul Asyikin
Ibrahim, Nurul Shakila
author_sort Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua
collection UITM
description With the evolution of time and technological devices, defamatory matter today has acquired itself a more 'global presence' in which it is capable of reaching mass numbers of people. This research is regarding Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability for online defamation. Despite the fact that ISPs is just acting as mere intermediaries, there are floodgates of claim against it whenever there is an online defamation suit. In fact, there should be a balance interest between the internet users and ISP which merely acted as intermediaries. This research will analyze the adequacy of our laws pertaining to this matter. For this purpose, several laws as well as regulations from the other countries will be compared with. We are in fact left behind in term of our laws as well as a practice to cope with online defamation suit. There is no explicit provision to govern the scope as well as the extent of the liability of ISP. ISP role is only being compiled under the Communication and Multimedia Act 1998. Yet, the wordings in those acts were found to be to general, leaving many questions behind. Plus, the traditional defamation law is also said to be too general to cope with the online defamation because internet is indeed unique in its creature. It needs further clarification. Several critics will also be looked into the laws as well as how and what are the recommendations to deal with several lacunas or inadequacy of the law. This will in turn revealed several lacunas or inadequacy of the already existing law. As the saying goes, 'the biggest room in this world is the room for improvement', and it is indeed many improvements in the law that could be made.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T02:17:38Z
format Student Project
id oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:31612
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T02:17:38Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:316122020-07-02T03:09:45Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31612/ ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua Noh, Nurul Asyikin Ibrahim, Nurul Shakila Technology and law With the evolution of time and technological devices, defamatory matter today has acquired itself a more 'global presence' in which it is capable of reaching mass numbers of people. This research is regarding Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability for online defamation. Despite the fact that ISPs is just acting as mere intermediaries, there are floodgates of claim against it whenever there is an online defamation suit. In fact, there should be a balance interest between the internet users and ISP which merely acted as intermediaries. This research will analyze the adequacy of our laws pertaining to this matter. For this purpose, several laws as well as regulations from the other countries will be compared with. We are in fact left behind in term of our laws as well as a practice to cope with online defamation suit. There is no explicit provision to govern the scope as well as the extent of the liability of ISP. ISP role is only being compiled under the Communication and Multimedia Act 1998. Yet, the wordings in those acts were found to be to general, leaving many questions behind. Plus, the traditional defamation law is also said to be too general to cope with the online defamation because internet is indeed unique in its creature. It needs further clarification. Several critics will also be looked into the laws as well as how and what are the recommendations to deal with several lacunas or inadequacy of the law. This will in turn revealed several lacunas or inadequacy of the already existing law. As the saying goes, 'the biggest room in this world is the room for improvement', and it is indeed many improvements in the law that could be made. 2012-12 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31612/1/31612.pdf ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim. (2012) [Student Project] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Technology and law
Mohd Fadzlan, Fazfida Najua
Noh, Nurul Asyikin
Ibrahim, Nurul Shakila
ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title_full ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title_fullStr ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title_full_unstemmed ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title_short ISP’s liability for online defamation: a comparative study with UK and US / Fazfida Najua Mohd Fadzlan, Nurul Asyikin Noh and Nurul Shakila Ibrahim
title_sort isp s liability for online defamation a comparative study with uk and us fazfida najua mohd fadzlan nurul asyikin noh and nurul shakila ibrahim
topic Technology and law
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31612/1/31612.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdfadzlanfazfidanajua ispsliabilityforonlinedefamationacomparativestudywithukandusfazfidanajuamohdfadzlannurulasyikinnohandnurulshakilaibrahim
AT nohnurulasyikin ispsliabilityforonlinedefamationacomparativestudywithukandusfazfidanajuamohdfadzlannurulasyikinnohandnurulshakilaibrahim
AT ibrahimnurulshakila ispsliabilityforonlinedefamationacomparativestudywithukandusfazfidanajuamohdfadzlannurulasyikinnohandnurulshakilaibrahim