The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya

This paper is an endeavor to determine the scope of protection as provided for by section 181 of the Malaysian Companies Act of 1965 by referring to cases that have interpreted the section. Secondly, it is to discuss the need of minority protection considering the various problems encountered by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Winston Kaya, Andrew
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/5384/2/5384.pdf
_version_ 1825733770056040448
author Winston Kaya, Andrew
author_facet Winston Kaya, Andrew
author_sort Winston Kaya, Andrew
collection UITM
description This paper is an endeavor to determine the scope of protection as provided for by section 181 of the Malaysian Companies Act of 1965 by referring to cases that have interpreted the section. Secondly, it is to discuss the need of minority protection considering the various problems encountered by minority shareholders which includes inter alia, the procedural rule as propounded in Foss v Harbottle as exemplified in Prudential Assurance's case. Thirdly is to compare section 210 of the U.K. Companies Act 1948 as this was the first attempt in England to provide for direct statutory protection for minority shareholders. Although Section 210 has been replaced by a new section 75, it is felt that a study of the old section is useful to understand the scope of section 181.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T01:21:58Z
format Student Project
id oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:5384
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T01:21:58Z
publishDate 1986
record_format dspace
spelling oai:ir.uitm.edu.my:53842022-12-23T07:48:54Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/5384/ The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya Winston Kaya, Andrew Commercial law This paper is an endeavor to determine the scope of protection as provided for by section 181 of the Malaysian Companies Act of 1965 by referring to cases that have interpreted the section. Secondly, it is to discuss the need of minority protection considering the various problems encountered by minority shareholders which includes inter alia, the procedural rule as propounded in Foss v Harbottle as exemplified in Prudential Assurance's case. Thirdly is to compare section 210 of the U.K. Companies Act 1948 as this was the first attempt in England to provide for direct statutory protection for minority shareholders. Although Section 210 has been replaced by a new section 75, it is felt that a study of the old section is useful to understand the scope of section 181. 1986 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/5384/2/5384.pdf The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya. (1986) [Student Project] <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/5384.pdf> (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Commercial law
Winston Kaya, Andrew
The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title_full The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title_fullStr The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title_full_unstemmed The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title_short The scope of Section 181 as a minority protection provision / Andrew Winston Kaya
title_sort scope of section 181 as a minority protection provision andrew winston kaya
topic Commercial law
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/5384/2/5384.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT winstonkayaandrew thescopeofsection181asaminorityprotectionprovisionandrewwinstonkaya
AT winstonkayaandrew scopeofsection181asaminorityprotectionprovisionandrewwinstonkaya