Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress

Evangelical Christians consistently endorse spiritual aetiologies for mental distress, which include the belief that mental distress can be treated solely through spiritual intervention (prayer, fasting and deliverance). The present survey examined the beliefs and experiences of 446 self-identified...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lloyd, Christopher E. M., Waller, Robert M.
Format: Article
Published: Informa UK Limited 2020
Subjects:
_version_ 1804072480170573824
author Lloyd, Christopher E. M.
Waller, Robert M.
author_facet Lloyd, Christopher E. M.
Waller, Robert M.
author_sort Lloyd, Christopher E. M.
collection LMU
description Evangelical Christians consistently endorse spiritual aetiologies for mental distress, which include the belief that mental distress can be treated solely through spiritual intervention (prayer, fasting and deliverance). The present survey examined the beliefs and experiences of 446 self-identified evangelical Christians considering growing public awareness of mental distress. The paper focuses on the extent to which church teaching represents mental distress as caused by “spiritual” factors, and how this affects beliefs about “secular” treatments and resulting interactions within communities of faith. Thirty-one percent of respondents reported experiencing teaching which exclusively spiritualised their mental distress. However, 94% endorsed secular interventions (psychological therapy) as effective. Additionally, 73% of respondents endorsed non-spiritual causal attributions (biological/neurological or traumatic/lived experiences) for mental distress. Overall, 56% indicated positive engagement within their faith communities. That respondents endorsed positive interactions within their churches, despite the presence of spiritualised teaching, highlights the limitations of anti-spiritualisation narratives. We argue for an approach to mental distress that is culturally sensitive and psychologically framed, and yet responds to individual and collective meaning-making regarding the interface between spiritual and psychological dimensions.
first_indexed 2024-07-09T03:59:49Z
format Article
id oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:5511
institution London Metropolitan University
last_indexed 2024-07-09T03:59:49Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Informa UK Limited
record_format eprints
spelling oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:55112022-11-11T09:14:16Z http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5511/ Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress Lloyd, Christopher E. M. Waller, Robert M. 280 Christian denominations & sects 360 Social problems & services; associations Evangelical Christians consistently endorse spiritual aetiologies for mental distress, which include the belief that mental distress can be treated solely through spiritual intervention (prayer, fasting and deliverance). The present survey examined the beliefs and experiences of 446 self-identified evangelical Christians considering growing public awareness of mental distress. The paper focuses on the extent to which church teaching represents mental distress as caused by “spiritual” factors, and how this affects beliefs about “secular” treatments and resulting interactions within communities of faith. Thirty-one percent of respondents reported experiencing teaching which exclusively spiritualised their mental distress. However, 94% endorsed secular interventions (psychological therapy) as effective. Additionally, 73% of respondents endorsed non-spiritual causal attributions (biological/neurological or traumatic/lived experiences) for mental distress. Overall, 56% indicated positive engagement within their faith communities. That respondents endorsed positive interactions within their churches, despite the presence of spiritualised teaching, highlights the limitations of anti-spiritualisation narratives. We argue for an approach to mental distress that is culturally sensitive and psychologically framed, and yet responds to individual and collective meaning-making regarding the interface between spiritual and psychological dimensions. Informa UK Limited 2020-01-23 Article PeerReviewed Lloyd, Christopher E. M. and Waller, Robert M. (2020) Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23 (8). pp. 679-690. ISSN 1469-9737 https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1675148 10.1080/13674676.2019.1675148
spellingShingle 280 Christian denominations & sects
360 Social problems & services; associations
Lloyd, Christopher E. M.
Waller, Robert M.
Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title_full Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title_fullStr Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title_full_unstemmed Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title_short Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress
title_sort demon disorder or none of the above a survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical christians with mental distress
topic 280 Christian denominations & sects
360 Social problems & services; associations
work_keys_str_mv AT lloydchristopherem demondisorderornoneoftheaboveasurveyoftheattitudesandexperiencesofevangelicalchristianswithmentaldistress
AT wallerrobertm demondisorderornoneoftheaboveasurveyoftheattitudesandexperiencesofevangelicalchristianswithmentaldistress