Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action executi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf |
_version_ | 1825625501092282368 |
---|---|
author | Calmels, Claire Holmes, Paul Jarry, Gilbert Hars, Magaly Lopez, Emilie Paillard, Aurore Stam, Cornelis J. |
author_facet | Calmels, Claire Holmes, Paul Jarry, Gilbert Hars, Magaly Lopez, Emilie Paillard, Aurore Stam, Cornelis J. |
author_sort | Calmels, Claire |
collection | LMU |
description | The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action execution and also prior to and during observation of the same action. Twelve participants observed a simple finger movement sequence. In a second testing session they physically executed the movement. EEGs were recorded from 19 active sites across the cortex. Activity was considered in four frequency bands (7–10 Hz, 10–13 Hz, 13–20 Hz, and 20–30 Hz) using a new measure: synchronization likelihood. This technique considers rapid changes in signal synchronization and spatiotemporal patterns of coherence. The results revealed no statistically significant difference in synchronization likelihood between the observation and execution data. We found an increase in synchronization over a broad frequency range during task processing and suggest that this may reflect interregional cortical coupling of intricately and hierarchically interconnected networks that are active in a similar way during both observation and execution of a movement. While EEG may be insensitive to differences present during the observation and execution of a movement, the results of the present study shed some light on the general mechanisms of cognitive integration. |
first_indexed | 2024-07-09T04:00:46Z |
format | Article |
id | oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:5911 |
institution | London Metropolitan University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-07-09T04:00:46Z |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | eprints |
spelling | oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:59112020-08-07T08:59:56Z https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/ Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement Calmels, Claire Holmes, Paul Jarry, Gilbert Hars, Magaly Lopez, Emilie Paillard, Aurore Stam, Cornelis J. 150 Psychology The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action execution and also prior to and during observation of the same action. Twelve participants observed a simple finger movement sequence. In a second testing session they physically executed the movement. EEGs were recorded from 19 active sites across the cortex. Activity was considered in four frequency bands (7–10 Hz, 10–13 Hz, 13–20 Hz, and 20–30 Hz) using a new measure: synchronization likelihood. This technique considers rapid changes in signal synchronization and spatiotemporal patterns of coherence. The results revealed no statistically significant difference in synchronization likelihood between the observation and execution data. We found an increase in synchronization over a broad frequency range during task processing and suggest that this may reflect interregional cortical coupling of intricately and hierarchically interconnected networks that are active in a similar way during both observation and execution of a movement. While EEG may be insensitive to differences present during the observation and execution of a movement, the results of the present study shed some light on the general mechanisms of cognitive integration. Wiley 2005-08-04 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf Calmels, Claire, Holmes, Paul, Jarry, Gilbert, Hars, Magaly, Lopez, Emilie, Paillard, Aurore and Stam, Cornelis J. (2005) Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement. Human Brain Mapping, 27 (3). pp. 251-266. ISSN 1065-9471 10.1002/hbm.20181 10.1002/hbm.20181 |
spellingShingle | 150 Psychology Calmels, Claire Holmes, Paul Jarry, Gilbert Hars, Magaly Lopez, Emilie Paillard, Aurore Stam, Cornelis J. Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title | Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title_full | Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title_fullStr | Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title_short | Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
title_sort | variability of eeg synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement |
topic | 150 Psychology |
url | https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calmelsclaire variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT holmespaul variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT jarrygilbert variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT harsmagaly variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT lopezemilie variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT paillardaurore variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement AT stamcornelisj variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement |