Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement

The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action executi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Calmels, Claire, Holmes, Paul, Jarry, Gilbert, Hars, Magaly, Lopez, Emilie, Paillard, Aurore, Stam, Cornelis J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf
_version_ 1825625501092282368
author Calmels, Claire
Holmes, Paul
Jarry, Gilbert
Hars, Magaly
Lopez, Emilie
Paillard, Aurore
Stam, Cornelis J.
author_facet Calmels, Claire
Holmes, Paul
Jarry, Gilbert
Hars, Magaly
Lopez, Emilie
Paillard, Aurore
Stam, Cornelis J.
author_sort Calmels, Claire
collection LMU
description The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action execution and also prior to and during observation of the same action. Twelve participants observed a simple finger movement sequence. In a second testing session they physically executed the movement. EEGs were recorded from 19 active sites across the cortex. Activity was considered in four frequency bands (7–10 Hz, 10–13 Hz, 13–20 Hz, and 20–30 Hz) using a new measure: synchronization likelihood. This technique considers rapid changes in signal synchronization and spatiotemporal patterns of coherence. The results revealed no statistically significant difference in synchronization likelihood between the observation and execution data. We found an increase in synchronization over a broad frequency range during task processing and suggest that this may reflect interregional cortical coupling of intricately and hierarchically interconnected networks that are active in a similar way during both observation and execution of a movement. While EEG may be insensitive to differences present during the observation and execution of a movement, the results of the present study shed some light on the general mechanisms of cognitive integration.
first_indexed 2024-07-09T04:00:46Z
format Article
id oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:5911
institution London Metropolitan University
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-09T04:00:46Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Wiley
record_format eprints
spelling oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:59112020-08-07T08:59:56Z https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/ Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement Calmels, Claire Holmes, Paul Jarry, Gilbert Hars, Magaly Lopez, Emilie Paillard, Aurore Stam, Cornelis J. 150 Psychology The aim of this study was to test the validity of mirror neuron activity in humans through analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) functional connectivity during an action not directed towards an object. We investigated changes in EEG interchannel synchronization prior to and during action execution and also prior to and during observation of the same action. Twelve participants observed a simple finger movement sequence. In a second testing session they physically executed the movement. EEGs were recorded from 19 active sites across the cortex. Activity was considered in four frequency bands (7–10 Hz, 10–13 Hz, 13–20 Hz, and 20–30 Hz) using a new measure: synchronization likelihood. This technique considers rapid changes in signal synchronization and spatiotemporal patterns of coherence. The results revealed no statistically significant difference in synchronization likelihood between the observation and execution data. We found an increase in synchronization over a broad frequency range during task processing and suggest that this may reflect interregional cortical coupling of intricately and hierarchically interconnected networks that are active in a similar way during both observation and execution of a movement. While EEG may be insensitive to differences present during the observation and execution of a movement, the results of the present study shed some light on the general mechanisms of cognitive integration. Wiley 2005-08-04 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf Calmels, Claire, Holmes, Paul, Jarry, Gilbert, Hars, Magaly, Lopez, Emilie, Paillard, Aurore and Stam, Cornelis J. (2005) Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement. Human Brain Mapping, 27 (3). pp. 251-266. ISSN 1065-9471 10.1002/hbm.20181 10.1002/hbm.20181
spellingShingle 150 Psychology
Calmels, Claire
Holmes, Paul
Jarry, Gilbert
Hars, Magaly
Lopez, Emilie
Paillard, Aurore
Stam, Cornelis J.
Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title_full Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title_fullStr Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title_full_unstemmed Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title_short Variability of EEG synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
title_sort variability of eeg synchronisation prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement
topic 150 Psychology
url https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5911/1/2006_Calmels_HBM.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT calmelsclaire variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT holmespaul variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT jarrygilbert variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT harsmagaly variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT lopezemilie variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT paillardaurore variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement
AT stamcornelisj variabilityofeegsynchronisationpriortoandduringobservationandexecutionofasequentialfingermovement