Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: the Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial

Background Acute psychiatric wards manage patients whose actions may threaten safety (conflict). Staff act to avert or minimise harm (containment). The Safewards model enabled the identification of ten interventions to reduce the frequency of both. Objective To test the efficacy of these interv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowers, Len, James, Karen, Quirk, Alan, Simpson, Alan, Stewart, Duncan, Hodsoll, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5984/1/1-s2.0-S0020748915001601-main.pdf
Description
Summary:Background Acute psychiatric wards manage patients whose actions may threaten safety (conflict). Staff act to avert or minimise harm (containment). The Safewards model enabled the identification of ten interventions to reduce the frequency of both. Objective To test the efficacy of these interventions. Design A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with psychiatric hospitals and wards as the units of randomisation. The main outcomes were rates of conflict and containment. Participants Staff and patients in 31 randomly chosen wards at 15 randomly chosen hospitals. Results For shifts with conflict or containment incidents, the experimental condition reduced the rate of conflict events by 15% (95% CI 5.6–23.7%) relative to the control intervention. The rate of containment events for the experimental intervention was reduced by 26.4% (95% CI 9.9–34.3%). Conclusions Simple interventions aiming to improve staff relationships with patients can reduce the frequency of conflict and containment.