Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance

How to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of emerging biotechnologies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing, is a global challenge. The occurrence of the “CRISPR babies” in 2018 publicly brought this issue into sharp focus, and led...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Leifan, Shang, Lijun, Zhang, Weiwen
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Elsevier 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/7/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf
https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/13/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf
_version_ 1804072863188123648
author Wang, Leifan
Shang, Lijun
Zhang, Weiwen
author_facet Wang, Leifan
Shang, Lijun
Zhang, Weiwen
author_sort Wang, Leifan
collection LMU
description How to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of emerging biotechnologies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing, is a global challenge. The occurrence of the “CRISPR babies” in 2018 publicly brought this issue into sharp focus, and led to comprehensive regulatory reform in China and various countries around the world. The current article analyzes this event-driven regulatory reform in China by elaborating the most salient provisions designed to prevent risk and protect individual rights, public health, and social morality relating to human genome editing in four important sectors of law: biosecurity law, civil code, criminal law and patent law. This situation highlights that, although regulation is being undertaken, the gaps between the law and advancing technology remain discernible, at both a national and transnational level (i.e., the “double-pacing problem”). Further attention and collaboration will be required to address the ongoing challenges associated with the use of human genome editing.
first_indexed 2024-07-09T04:05:54Z
format Article
id oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:8121
institution London Metropolitan University
language English
English
last_indexed 2024-07-09T04:05:54Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format eprints
spelling oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:81212024-01-25T10:43:50Z http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/ Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance Wang, Leifan Shang, Lijun Zhang, Weiwen 320 Political science 360 Social problems & services; associations 570 Life sciences; biology How to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of emerging biotechnologies, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing, is a global challenge. The occurrence of the “CRISPR babies” in 2018 publicly brought this issue into sharp focus, and led to comprehensive regulatory reform in China and various countries around the world. The current article analyzes this event-driven regulatory reform in China by elaborating the most salient provisions designed to prevent risk and protect individual rights, public health, and social morality relating to human genome editing in four important sectors of law: biosecurity law, civil code, criminal law and patent law. This situation highlights that, although regulation is being undertaken, the gaps between the law and advancing technology remain discernible, at both a national and transnational level (i.e., the “double-pacing problem”). Further attention and collaboration will be required to address the ongoing challenges associated with the use of human genome editing. Elsevier 2023-01-26 Article NonPeerReviewed text en cc_by_4 https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/7/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf text en cc_by_4 https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/13/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf Wang, Leifan, Shang, Lijun and Zhang, Weiwen (2023) Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 5 (1). pp. 8-13. ISSN 2588-9338 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933822000280?via%3Dihub 10.1016/j.jobb.2022.12.003
spellingShingle 320 Political science
360 Social problems & services; associations
570 Life sciences; biology
Wang, Leifan
Shang, Lijun
Zhang, Weiwen
Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title_full Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title_fullStr Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title_full_unstemmed Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title_short Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: the double-pacing problem and collaborative governance
title_sort human genome editing after the crispr babies the double pacing problem and collaborative governance
topic 320 Political science
360 Social problems & services; associations
570 Life sciences; biology
url https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/7/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf
https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8121/13/1-s2.0-S2588933822000280-main.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wangleifan humangenomeeditingafterthecrisprbabiesthedoublepacingproblemandcollaborativegovernance
AT shanglijun humangenomeeditingafterthecrisprbabiesthedoublepacingproblemandcollaborativegovernance
AT zhangweiwen humangenomeeditingafterthecrisprbabiesthedoublepacingproblemandcollaborativegovernance