A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture

"Architecture comes into being only as we talk about and hypothesize about it; the buildings left ‘out in the rain’ participate in the discourse of architecture inasmuch as architects include them in their conscious act of theorizing."...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Catina, Alexander
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/854/1/A%20view%20Made%20Unnecessary_AC_abstract.docx
_version_ 1804071593229418496
author Catina, Alexander
author_facet Catina, Alexander
author_sort Catina, Alexander
collection LMU
description "Architecture comes into being only as we talk about and hypothesize about it; the buildings left ‘out in the rain’ participate in the discourse of architecture inasmuch as architects include them in their conscious act of theorizing." Emmanuel Petit, 2013 As deus ex machina, theory posits that public art cannot exist in a culture of disrupted certainties, unless its innate representational virtues are subject to it. Is it a matter, characteristically ironic, of what we expect to talk about and how when we address the strange poetics of irony-work in architecture? Irony-work was once restrained to the private consumption of social art, the novel, from which the modern notion of irony first sprang. With the ascent of certain theories that favor the social aspects of art, architecture has been made to mimic the novel’s virtue. This paper sets out to defend architecture’s acquired sense of uncertainty in the modern age. The term irony-work, borrowed from Freud’s description of the social function of the joke, is paramount in making a parody of theory’s quest to save architecture from oblivion. For the purpose of illustration, I will look at architectural archetypes, such as a series of temples in modern guise (London, Leeds, Berlin). At the end, a car park in Berlin, where context brings about an inescapable ironic charge, will serve as the stage for an anti-heroic architectural gesture, which negates originality in favor of lost purpose. To what end? One might suggest that the stetting sun on architecture’s public identity coincides with the dawn of a certain genre of theories, which claims the idioms of criticism for itself. The view that theory adds value to our understanding of social aspects of irony-work in architecture will be challenged.
first_indexed 2024-07-09T03:45:43Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:854
institution London Metropolitan University
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-09T03:45:43Z
publishDate 2015
record_format eprints
spelling oai:repository.londonmet.ac.uk:8542016-01-07T10:08:06Z http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/854/ A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture Catina, Alexander 720 Architecture 900 History & geography "Architecture comes into being only as we talk about and hypothesize about it; the buildings left ‘out in the rain’ participate in the discourse of architecture inasmuch as architects include them in their conscious act of theorizing." Emmanuel Petit, 2013 As deus ex machina, theory posits that public art cannot exist in a culture of disrupted certainties, unless its innate representational virtues are subject to it. Is it a matter, characteristically ironic, of what we expect to talk about and how when we address the strange poetics of irony-work in architecture? Irony-work was once restrained to the private consumption of social art, the novel, from which the modern notion of irony first sprang. With the ascent of certain theories that favor the social aspects of art, architecture has been made to mimic the novel’s virtue. This paper sets out to defend architecture’s acquired sense of uncertainty in the modern age. The term irony-work, borrowed from Freud’s description of the social function of the joke, is paramount in making a parody of theory’s quest to save architecture from oblivion. For the purpose of illustration, I will look at architectural archetypes, such as a series of temples in modern guise (London, Leeds, Berlin). At the end, a car park in Berlin, where context brings about an inescapable ironic charge, will serve as the stage for an anti-heroic architectural gesture, which negates originality in favor of lost purpose. To what end? One might suggest that the stetting sun on architecture’s public identity coincides with the dawn of a certain genre of theories, which claims the idioms of criticism for itself. The view that theory adds value to our understanding of social aspects of irony-work in architecture will be challenged. 2015-11-21 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/854/1/A%20view%20Made%20Unnecessary_AC_abstract.docx Catina, Alexander (2015) A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture. In: AHRA conference 2015: That Thing Called Theory, 19th-21st Novemeber 2015, Beckett University Leeds. (Unpublished)
spellingShingle 720 Architecture
900 History & geography
Catina, Alexander
A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title_full A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title_fullStr A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title_full_unstemmed A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title_short A view made unnecessary: questioning a theory of irony-work in architecture
title_sort view made unnecessary questioning a theory of irony work in architecture
topic 720 Architecture
900 History & geography
url https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/854/1/A%20view%20Made%20Unnecessary_AC_abstract.docx
work_keys_str_mv AT catinaalexander aviewmadeunnecessaryquestioningatheoryofironyworkinarchitecture
AT catinaalexander viewmadeunnecessaryquestioningatheoryofironyworkinarchitecture