Psychometric performance of the Chichewa versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L among healthy and sick children and adolescents in Malawi

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong>&nbsp;The EuroQol Group has developed an extended version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L with five response levels for each of its five dimensions (EQ-5D-Y-5L). The psychometric performance has been reported in several studies for the EQ-5D-Y-3L but not for th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngwira, LG, Maheswaran, H, Verstraete, J, Petrou, S, Niessen, L, Smith, SC
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023
Description
Summary:<p><strong>Objectives:</strong>&nbsp;The EuroQol Group has developed an extended version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L with five response levels for each of its five dimensions (EQ-5D-Y-5L). The psychometric performance has been reported in several studies for the EQ-5D-Y-3L but not for the EQ-5D-Y-5L. This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Chichewa (Malawi) versions.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong>&nbsp;The EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L and PedsQL&trade; 4.0 Chichewa versions were administered to children and adolescents aged 8&ndash;17&nbsp;years in Blantyre, Malawi. Both of the EQ-5D-Y versions were evaluated for missing data, floor/ceiling effects, and validity (convergent, discriminant, known-group and empirical).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;A total of 289 participants (95 healthy, and 194 chronic and acute) self-completed the questionnaires. There was little problem with missing data (&lt;&thinsp;5%) except in children aged 8&ndash;12&nbsp;years particularly for the EQ-5D-Y-5L. Ceiling effects was generally reduced in moving from the EQ-5D-Y-3L to the EQ-5D-Y-5L. For both EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L, convergent validity tested with PedsQL&trade; 4.0 was found to be satisfactory (correlation&thinsp;&ge;&thinsp;0.4) at scale level but mixed at dimension /sub-scale level. There was evidence of discriminant validity (<em>p</em>&thinsp;&gt;&thinsp;0.05) with respect to gender and age, but not for school grade (<em>p</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.05). For empirical validity, the EQ-5D-Y-5L was 31&ndash;91% less efficient than the EQ-5D-Y-3L at detecting differences in health status using external measures.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>&nbsp;Both versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L had issues with missing data in younger children. Convergent validity, discriminant validity with respect to gender and age, and known-group validity of either measures were also met for use among children and adolescents in this population, although with some limitations (discriminant validity by grade and empirical validity). The EQ-5D-Y-3L seems particularly suited for use in younger children (8&ndash;12&nbsp;years) and the EQ-5D-Y-5L in adolescents (13&ndash;17&nbsp;years). However, further psychometric testing is required for test re-test reliability and responsiveness that could not be carried out in this study due to COVID-19 restrictions.</p>