Clough, Emerson, and knowingness

The poetry of Arthur Hugh Clough has tended to be read in dialogue with the writings of his friend and critic, Matthew Arnold. This essay explores how bringing Clough’s work into conversation with that of a very different friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, offers to cast his intellectual affinities and po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McGhee, F
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2020
_version_ 1826256514436825088
author McGhee, F
author_facet McGhee, F
author_sort McGhee, F
collection OXFORD
description The poetry of Arthur Hugh Clough has tended to be read in dialogue with the writings of his friend and critic, Matthew Arnold. This essay explores how bringing Clough’s work into conversation with that of a very different friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, offers to cast his intellectual affinities and poetic technique in a new light. Interweaving close readings of Clough’s verse with detailed attention to the essays he is known to have read and admired, I trace how Clough adapts and revises Emerson’s critique of ‘knowingness’. Beginning by tracing the history of this term in nineteenth-century literature and culture, I argue that Clough’s Dipsychus shapes an Emersonian ethic and aesthetic of encounter as an alternative to complacent and proprietorial forms of knowing. Turning to the rest of Clough’s oeuvre, especially Amours de Voyage, I then consider how fantasies of the future are central to what it means to be knowing about oneself, and examine how Clough applies poetic pressure to Emerson’s conviction that ‘A man … never rises so high as when he knows not whither he is going’.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:03:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:00992bf5-bda5-4dab-884f-5aa2903cddde
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:03:26Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:00992bf5-bda5-4dab-884f-5aa2903cddde2022-03-26T08:30:27ZClough, Emerson, and knowingnessJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:00992bf5-bda5-4dab-884f-5aa2903cdddeEnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2020McGhee, FThe poetry of Arthur Hugh Clough has tended to be read in dialogue with the writings of his friend and critic, Matthew Arnold. This essay explores how bringing Clough’s work into conversation with that of a very different friend, Ralph Waldo Emerson, offers to cast his intellectual affinities and poetic technique in a new light. Interweaving close readings of Clough’s verse with detailed attention to the essays he is known to have read and admired, I trace how Clough adapts and revises Emerson’s critique of ‘knowingness’. Beginning by tracing the history of this term in nineteenth-century literature and culture, I argue that Clough’s Dipsychus shapes an Emersonian ethic and aesthetic of encounter as an alternative to complacent and proprietorial forms of knowing. Turning to the rest of Clough’s oeuvre, especially Amours de Voyage, I then consider how fantasies of the future are central to what it means to be knowing about oneself, and examine how Clough applies poetic pressure to Emerson’s conviction that ‘A man … never rises so high as when he knows not whither he is going’.
spellingShingle McGhee, F
Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title_full Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title_fullStr Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title_full_unstemmed Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title_short Clough, Emerson, and knowingness
title_sort clough emerson and knowingness
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgheef cloughemersonandknowingness