Lawful Power

<p>This is the edited text of the 2016 Robin Cooke Lecture, delivered at Victoria University of Wellington on 15 December 2016.</p><p> It is a popular idea that public agencies (or perhaps only executive agencies) cannot lawfully do anything unless it is positively authorised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Endicott, T
Format: Journal article
Published: New Zealand Centre for Public Law, Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington 2017
_version_ 1826256718574649344
author Endicott, T
author_facet Endicott, T
author_sort Endicott, T
collection OXFORD
description <p>This is the edited text of the 2016 Robin Cooke Lecture, delivered at Victoria University of Wellington on 15 December 2016.</p><p> It is a popular idea that public agencies (or perhaps only executive agencies) cannot lawfully do anything unless it is positively authorised by law. Through a discussion of the prerogatives of the Crown, of Parliament and of the courts in the United Kingdom, I argue to the contrary. Public bodies may legitimately do anything that serves the purposes for which they exist, unless it is prohibited by law. Such actions are exercises of lawful power, insofar as they are not unlawful. The Lecture discusses the English High Court's ruling in the case of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. An epilogue explains the Supreme Court decision in Mrs Miller's case and its bearing on the topic of the Lecture.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:06:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:01ac455d-caa2-4d39-82a2-85bc423511e2
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:06:42Z
publishDate 2017
publisher New Zealand Centre for Public Law, Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:01ac455d-caa2-4d39-82a2-85bc423511e22022-03-26T08:36:17ZLawful PowerJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:01ac455d-caa2-4d39-82a2-85bc423511e2Symplectic Elements at OxfordNew Zealand Centre for Public Law, Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington2017Endicott, T<p>This is the edited text of the 2016 Robin Cooke Lecture, delivered at Victoria University of Wellington on 15 December 2016.</p><p> It is a popular idea that public agencies (or perhaps only executive agencies) cannot lawfully do anything unless it is positively authorised by law. Through a discussion of the prerogatives of the Crown, of Parliament and of the courts in the United Kingdom, I argue to the contrary. Public bodies may legitimately do anything that serves the purposes for which they exist, unless it is prohibited by law. Such actions are exercises of lawful power, insofar as they are not unlawful. The Lecture discusses the English High Court's ruling in the case of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. An epilogue explains the Supreme Court decision in Mrs Miller's case and its bearing on the topic of the Lecture.</p>
spellingShingle Endicott, T
Lawful Power
title Lawful Power
title_full Lawful Power
title_fullStr Lawful Power
title_full_unstemmed Lawful Power
title_short Lawful Power
title_sort lawful power
work_keys_str_mv AT endicottt lawfulpower