For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK

The current literature shows that both absolute and relative income are important for happiness, but there is little work emphasising how the strength of the relationship is dependent on personal and social factors. I hypothesise that social connectedness influences the money-happiness relationship...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richards, L
Format: Journal article
Published: Springer Verlag 2015
_version_ 1797050545543839744
author Richards, L
author_facet Richards, L
author_sort Richards, L
collection OXFORD
description The current literature shows that both absolute and relative income are important for happiness, but there is little work emphasising how the strength of the relationship is dependent on personal and social factors. I hypothesise that social connectedness influences the money-happiness relationship because the effect of money is in part felt through the acquisition of social status, whereas status (and associated psychological benefits such as self-worth) can alternatively be gained through social connectedness. In particular, it is theorised that ‘weak ties’ when co-existing with good quality informal ties have a separable and additional benefit to subjective well-being, and that it is the socially isolated who have the most to gain from doing well financially. Social connectedness is conceptualised as a ‘resilience resource’ which has a buffering effect on subjective well-being. Data from the British Household Panel Survey are used, first to establish a measurement schema of connectedness using latent class analysis, and secondly in a multilevel model of life satisfaction with observations from seven consecutive years nested within individuals. The results show that connectedness makes a larger difference to satisfaction in times of financial stress, and that the satisfaction of the socially isolated can ‘catch up’ to some degree with those with larger networks when things are going well financially. The findings also confirm that those for whom money makes the smallest contribution to happiness are those with both strong and weak ties. Weak ties have an additional benefit compared to having strong ties alone. In summary, connectedness has the power to narrow the well-being gap that exists between times of financial struggle and times of relative comfort. It suggests that the psychological benefits of social integration have the capacity to displace money as a source of status and self-worth, and similarly that the importance of money may be exaggerated where these psychological gains are not available through other domains of life.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:06:44Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:01af0c3c-679f-4d54-a8f0-dc309b24b699
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:06:44Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Verlag
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:01af0c3c-679f-4d54-a8f0-dc309b24b6992022-03-26T08:36:20ZFor whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UKJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:01af0c3c-679f-4d54-a8f0-dc309b24b699Symplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Verlag2015Richards, LThe current literature shows that both absolute and relative income are important for happiness, but there is little work emphasising how the strength of the relationship is dependent on personal and social factors. I hypothesise that social connectedness influences the money-happiness relationship because the effect of money is in part felt through the acquisition of social status, whereas status (and associated psychological benefits such as self-worth) can alternatively be gained through social connectedness. In particular, it is theorised that ‘weak ties’ when co-existing with good quality informal ties have a separable and additional benefit to subjective well-being, and that it is the socially isolated who have the most to gain from doing well financially. Social connectedness is conceptualised as a ‘resilience resource’ which has a buffering effect on subjective well-being. Data from the British Household Panel Survey are used, first to establish a measurement schema of connectedness using latent class analysis, and secondly in a multilevel model of life satisfaction with observations from seven consecutive years nested within individuals. The results show that connectedness makes a larger difference to satisfaction in times of financial stress, and that the satisfaction of the socially isolated can ‘catch up’ to some degree with those with larger networks when things are going well financially. The findings also confirm that those for whom money makes the smallest contribution to happiness are those with both strong and weak ties. Weak ties have an additional benefit compared to having strong ties alone. In summary, connectedness has the power to narrow the well-being gap that exists between times of financial struggle and times of relative comfort. It suggests that the psychological benefits of social integration have the capacity to displace money as a source of status and self-worth, and similarly that the importance of money may be exaggerated where these psychological gains are not available through other domains of life.
spellingShingle Richards, L
For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title_full For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title_fullStr For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title_full_unstemmed For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title_short For whom money matters less: social connectedness as a resilience resource in the UK
title_sort for whom money matters less social connectedness as a resilience resource in the uk
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsl forwhommoneymatterslesssocialconnectednessasaresilienceresourceintheuk