Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation

<p>Pain is regulated endogenously through both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms. We hypothesized that two novel pain modulation tasks, one drawing on context/expectations and one using voluntary reappraisal, would show differing levels of opioid dependence. Specifically, we expected that nalox...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Berna, C, Leknes, S, Ahmad, A, Mhuircheartaigh, R, Goodwin, G, Tracey, I
Định dạng: Journal article
Ngôn ngữ:English
Được phát hành: Society for Neuroscience 2018
_version_ 1826256748788318208
author Berna, C
Leknes, S
Ahmad, A
Mhuircheartaigh, R
Goodwin, G
Tracey, I
author_facet Berna, C
Leknes, S
Ahmad, A
Mhuircheartaigh, R
Goodwin, G
Tracey, I
author_sort Berna, C
collection OXFORD
description <p>Pain is regulated endogenously through both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms. We hypothesized that two novel pain modulation tasks, one drawing on context/expectations and one using voluntary reappraisal, would show differing levels of opioid dependence. Specifically, we expected that naloxone would block context-related analgesia, whereas mental imagery-based pain reappraisal would be opioid-independent.</p><p> A double-blind, placebo-controlled intravenous naloxone versus saline crossover design was used. Twenty healthy volunteers completed the two modulation tasks with acute heat stimuli calibrated to induce moderate pain. In the mental imagery task, participants imagined either a “pleasant” or a “comparison” scenario during painful heat. In the relative relief task, moderate heat stimuli coincided with visual cues eliciting relief from the expectation of intense pain, and were compared with moderate heat stimuli delivered under the expectation of non-painful warmth. Both “pleasant imagery” and “relative relief” conditions significantly improved ratings of pain intensity and pleasantness during saline treatment. Indeed, the target stimuli in both tasks, which had been calibrated to induce moderate pain, were rated as mildly pleasant. Furthermore, consistently with the main hypothesis, blocking endogenous opioid signaling with naloxone did not significantly affect imagery-induced regulation of pain intensity or pleasantness. In contrast, the relative relief-induced pain regulation (i.e., context/expectation) was blocked by naloxone. We conclude that endogenous opioid signaling is necessary for expectation-related relative relief analgesia, but not for pain reappraisal through mental imagery. These results support mental imagery as a powerful and clinically relevant strategy for regulating pain affect also in patients where endogenous opioid mechanisms might be compromised.</p><p> SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neurotransmitter systems in the human brain can be probed through antagonist drugs. Studies using the opioid antagonist naloxone have demonstrated that the brain relies on both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms to downregulate pain. This holds clinical relevance given altered endogenous opioid processes in many chronic pain conditions. The present study used a double-blinded, placebo-controlled naloxone blockage of endogenous opioids in healthy humans to show differential opioid involvement in two pain modulation tasks. Context/expectation-driven (relative relief-related) analgesia was blocked by naloxone. In contrast, pain reappraisal through mental imagery was intact despite opioid receptor blockade, suggesting opioid independence. These results support mental imagery as a powerful, clinically relevant strategy for regulating pain as it does not rely on a functioning opioidergic system.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:07:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:01d19c02-6c33-47a8-817b-dbd258da1d61
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:07:11Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:01d19c02-6c33-47a8-817b-dbd258da1d612022-03-26T08:37:03ZOpioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:01d19c02-6c33-47a8-817b-dbd258da1d61EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSociety for Neuroscience2018Berna, CLeknes, SAhmad, AMhuircheartaigh, RGoodwin, GTracey, I<p>Pain is regulated endogenously through both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms. We hypothesized that two novel pain modulation tasks, one drawing on context/expectations and one using voluntary reappraisal, would show differing levels of opioid dependence. Specifically, we expected that naloxone would block context-related analgesia, whereas mental imagery-based pain reappraisal would be opioid-independent.</p><p> A double-blind, placebo-controlled intravenous naloxone versus saline crossover design was used. Twenty healthy volunteers completed the two modulation tasks with acute heat stimuli calibrated to induce moderate pain. In the mental imagery task, participants imagined either a “pleasant” or a “comparison” scenario during painful heat. In the relative relief task, moderate heat stimuli coincided with visual cues eliciting relief from the expectation of intense pain, and were compared with moderate heat stimuli delivered under the expectation of non-painful warmth. Both “pleasant imagery” and “relative relief” conditions significantly improved ratings of pain intensity and pleasantness during saline treatment. Indeed, the target stimuli in both tasks, which had been calibrated to induce moderate pain, were rated as mildly pleasant. Furthermore, consistently with the main hypothesis, blocking endogenous opioid signaling with naloxone did not significantly affect imagery-induced regulation of pain intensity or pleasantness. In contrast, the relative relief-induced pain regulation (i.e., context/expectation) was blocked by naloxone. We conclude that endogenous opioid signaling is necessary for expectation-related relative relief analgesia, but not for pain reappraisal through mental imagery. These results support mental imagery as a powerful and clinically relevant strategy for regulating pain affect also in patients where endogenous opioid mechanisms might be compromised.</p><p> SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neurotransmitter systems in the human brain can be probed through antagonist drugs. Studies using the opioid antagonist naloxone have demonstrated that the brain relies on both opioid and non-opioid mechanisms to downregulate pain. This holds clinical relevance given altered endogenous opioid processes in many chronic pain conditions. The present study used a double-blinded, placebo-controlled naloxone blockage of endogenous opioids in healthy humans to show differential opioid involvement in two pain modulation tasks. Context/expectation-driven (relative relief-related) analgesia was blocked by naloxone. In contrast, pain reappraisal through mental imagery was intact despite opioid receptor blockade, suggesting opioid independence. These results support mental imagery as a powerful, clinically relevant strategy for regulating pain as it does not rely on a functioning opioidergic system.</p>
spellingShingle Berna, C
Leknes, S
Ahmad, A
Mhuircheartaigh, R
Goodwin, G
Tracey, I
Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title_full Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title_fullStr Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title_full_unstemmed Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title_short Opioid-independent and opioid-mediated modes of pain modulation
title_sort opioid independent and opioid mediated modes of pain modulation
work_keys_str_mv AT bernac opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation
AT lekness opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation
AT ahmada opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation
AT mhuircheartaighr opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation
AT goodwing opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation
AT traceyi opioidindependentandopioidmediatedmodesofpainmodulation