Why precedent works

This chapter presents a social model of precedent, one in which the legal rules of precedent are supplemented by non-legal rules generated within social groups, principally the legal community of which the judge is a part. It argues that the legal structures of precedent are not enough, in themselv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barber, NW
Other Authors: Endicott, T
Format: Book section
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2023
_version_ 1797112320698089472
author Barber, NW
author2 Endicott, T
author_facet Endicott, T
Barber, NW
author_sort Barber, NW
collection OXFORD
description This chapter presents a social model of precedent, one in which the legal rules of precedent are supplemented by non-legal rules generated within social groups, principally the legal community of which the judge is a part. It argues that the legal structures of precedent are not enough, in themselves, to explain how the practice operates and, in particular, how it is that judges come to experience precedent as coercive. Precedent should be understood as a social practice, a mode of argumentation partly structured by non-legal rules that operate within social groups, and social expectations are key to the effectiveness of these rules. The chapter concludes by considering some of the problems raised by the roles of social groups in the operation of precedent, and suggests ways in which these problems may be mitigated.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:22:32Z
format Book section
id oxford-uuid:026457be-614b-4757-b508-e58cce74b3e4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:22:32Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:026457be-614b-4757-b508-e58cce74b3e42024-02-08T15:31:39ZWhy precedent worksBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:026457be-614b-4757-b508-e58cce74b3e4EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2023Barber, NWEndicott, TKrisjannson, HLewis, SThis chapter presents a social model of precedent, one in which the legal rules of precedent are supplemented by non-legal rules generated within social groups, principally the legal community of which the judge is a part. It argues that the legal structures of precedent are not enough, in themselves, to explain how the practice operates and, in particular, how it is that judges come to experience precedent as coercive. Precedent should be understood as a social practice, a mode of argumentation partly structured by non-legal rules that operate within social groups, and social expectations are key to the effectiveness of these rules. The chapter concludes by considering some of the problems raised by the roles of social groups in the operation of precedent, and suggests ways in which these problems may be mitigated.
spellingShingle Barber, NW
Why precedent works
title Why precedent works
title_full Why precedent works
title_fullStr Why precedent works
title_full_unstemmed Why precedent works
title_short Why precedent works
title_sort why precedent works
work_keys_str_mv AT barbernw whyprecedentworks