Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children : an ethical analysis
Davis (2014) called for “extreme caution” in the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to treat neurological disorders in children, due to gaps in scientific knowledge. We are sympathetic to his position. However, we must also address the ethical implications of applying this technology to mi...
Main Authors: | Maslen, H, Earp, B, Cohen Kadosh, R, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers
2014
|
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices : extending the medical model
by: Maslen, H, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement : how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate
by: Maslen, H, et al.
Published: (2014) -
When is diminishment a form of enhancement? : rethinking the enhancement debate in biomedical ethics
by: Earp, B, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Neuroreductionism about sex and love
by: Earp, B, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Autonomy and enhancement
by: Schaefer, G, et al.
Published: (2014)