Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.

Lignende værker

• A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
  af: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
  Udgivet: (2014)
• Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients.
  af: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
  Udgivet: (2011)
• Reply from authors re: Quoc-Dien Trinh, Khurshid R. Ghani, Mani Menon. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Ready to be counted? Eur Urol 2012;62:16-8: Walking the tightrope: Balancing cancer control, urinary continence, and sexual function - A programmatic evolution
  af: Tewari, A, et al.
  Udgivet: (2012)
• Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a critical analysis of its impact on urinary continence.
  af: Srivastava, A, et al.
  Udgivet: (2011)
• Dorsal vein complex control after apical dissection results in low apical positive surgical margins, but other surgical maneuvers are required to optimize early continence recovery.
  af: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
  Udgivet: (2011)