Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke thrombolysis is limited by the "last-seen well" principle, which defines stroke onset time. A significant minority of stroke patients (~15%) awake with their symptoms and are by definition ineligible for thrombolysis because they were "last-seen well" at the t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hill, MD, Kenney, C, Dzialowski, I, Boulanger, J, Demchuk, A, Barber, P, Watson, T, Weir, N, Buchan, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1797050959999795200
author Hill, MD
Kenney, C
Dzialowski, I
Boulanger, J
Demchuk, A
Barber, P
Watson, T
Weir, N
Buchan, A
author_facet Hill, MD
Kenney, C
Dzialowski, I
Boulanger, J
Demchuk, A
Barber, P
Watson, T
Weir, N
Buchan, A
author_sort Hill, MD
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Stroke thrombolysis is limited by the "last-seen well" principle, which defines stroke onset time. A significant minority of stroke patients (~15%) awake with their symptoms and are by definition ineligible for thrombolysis because they were "last-seen well" at the time they went to bed implying an interval that is most often greater than three hours. METHODS: A single-centre prospective, safety study was designed to thrombolyse 20 subjects with stroke-on-awakening. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were last seen well less than 12 hours previously, specifically including those who awoke from sleep with their stroke deficits. They had a baseline computed tomogram (CT) scan with an ASPECTS score greater than 5, no evidence of well-evolved infarction and a CT angiogram / Trans-cranial Doppler ultrasound study demonstrating an intracranial arterial occlusion. Patients fulfilled all other standard criteria for stroke thrombolysis. The primary outcome was safety defined by symptomatic ICH or death. RESULTS: Among 89 screened patients, 20 were treated with thrombolysis. Two patients (10%) died due to massive carotid territory stroke and two patients (10%) died of stroke complications. Two patients (10%) showed asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (petechial hemorrhage) and none symptomatic ICH. Reasons for exclusion were: (a) ASPECTS ≤ 5 (29); (b) well-evolved infarcts on CT (19); (c) historical mRS > 2 (17); (d) no demonstrable arterial occlusion or were too mild to warrant treatment (10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who awake with their deficits can be safely treated with thrombolysis based upon a tissue window defined by NCCT and CTA/TCD.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:12:57Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:03a38572-ad74-418d-a023-432dd8b2d8bf
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:12:57Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:03a38572-ad74-418d-a023-432dd8b2d8bf2022-03-26T08:47:24ZTissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:03a38572-ad74-418d-a023-432dd8b2d8bfEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Hill, MDKenney, CDzialowski, IBoulanger, JDemchuk, ABarber, PWatson, TWeir, NBuchan, A BACKGROUND: Stroke thrombolysis is limited by the "last-seen well" principle, which defines stroke onset time. A significant minority of stroke patients (~15%) awake with their symptoms and are by definition ineligible for thrombolysis because they were "last-seen well" at the time they went to bed implying an interval that is most often greater than three hours. METHODS: A single-centre prospective, safety study was designed to thrombolyse 20 subjects with stroke-on-awakening. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were last seen well less than 12 hours previously, specifically including those who awoke from sleep with their stroke deficits. They had a baseline computed tomogram (CT) scan with an ASPECTS score greater than 5, no evidence of well-evolved infarction and a CT angiogram / Trans-cranial Doppler ultrasound study demonstrating an intracranial arterial occlusion. Patients fulfilled all other standard criteria for stroke thrombolysis. The primary outcome was safety defined by symptomatic ICH or death. RESULTS: Among 89 screened patients, 20 were treated with thrombolysis. Two patients (10%) died due to massive carotid territory stroke and two patients (10%) died of stroke complications. Two patients (10%) showed asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (petechial hemorrhage) and none symptomatic ICH. Reasons for exclusion were: (a) ASPECTS ≤ 5 (29); (b) well-evolved infarcts on CT (19); (c) historical mRS > 2 (17); (d) no demonstrable arterial occlusion or were too mild to warrant treatment (10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who awake with their deficits can be safely treated with thrombolysis based upon a tissue window defined by NCCT and CTA/TCD.
spellingShingle Hill, MD
Kenney, C
Dzialowski, I
Boulanger, J
Demchuk, A
Barber, P
Watson, T
Weir, N
Buchan, A
Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title_full Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title_fullStr Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title_short Tissue Window in Stroke Thrombolysis study (TWIST): a safety study.
title_sort tissue window in stroke thrombolysis study twist a safety study
work_keys_str_mv AT hillmd tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT kenneyc tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT dzialowskii tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT boulangerj tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT demchuka tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT barberp tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT watsont tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT weirn tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy
AT buchana tissuewindowinstrokethrombolysisstudytwistasafetystudy