Democracy, Development, and Conflict

Currently the strategy for promoting internal peace favoured by the international community is to promote democracy, the rationale being that democratic accountability lowers incentives for rebellion. We argue that democracy also constrains the technical possibilities of government repression, and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Collier, P, Rohner, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
_version_ 1797051014007750656
author Collier, P
Rohner, D
author_facet Collier, P
Rohner, D
author_sort Collier, P
collection OXFORD
description Currently the strategy for promoting internal peace favoured by the international community is to promote democracy, the rationale being that democratic accountability lowers incentives for rebellion. We argue that democracy also constrains the technical possibilities of government repression, and that this makes rebellion easier. Although the net effect of democracy is therefore ambiguous, we suggest that the higher is income the more likely is it to be favourable. Empirically, we find that whereas in rich countries democracy makes countries safer, below an income threshold democracy increases proneness to political violence. We show that these results hold for a wide variety of forms of political violence.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:13:46Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:03e553bf-c33a-433a-8168-64eb57f2abaa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:13:46Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:03e553bf-c33a-433a-8168-64eb57f2abaa2022-03-26T08:48:51ZDemocracy, Development, and ConflictJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:03e553bf-c33a-433a-8168-64eb57f2abaaEnglishORA review teamWiley2008Collier, PRohner, DCurrently the strategy for promoting internal peace favoured by the international community is to promote democracy, the rationale being that democratic accountability lowers incentives for rebellion. We argue that democracy also constrains the technical possibilities of government repression, and that this makes rebellion easier. Although the net effect of democracy is therefore ambiguous, we suggest that the higher is income the more likely is it to be favourable. Empirically, we find that whereas in rich countries democracy makes countries safer, below an income threshold democracy increases proneness to political violence. We show that these results hold for a wide variety of forms of political violence.
spellingShingle Collier, P
Rohner, D
Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title_full Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title_fullStr Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title_short Democracy, Development, and Conflict
title_sort democracy development and conflict
work_keys_str_mv AT collierp democracydevelopmentandconflict
AT rohnerd democracydevelopmentandconflict