Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters
Evaluation of the structural connectivity (SC) of the brain based on tractography has mainly focused on the choice of diffusion model, tractography algorithm, and their respective parameter settings. Here, we systematically validate SC derived from a post mortem monkey brain, while varying key acqui...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797051337889808384 |
|---|---|
| author | Ambrosen, KS Eskildsen, SF Hinne, M Krug, K Lundell, H Schmidt, MN Van Gerven, MAJ Mørup, M Dyrby, TB |
| author_facet | Ambrosen, KS Eskildsen, SF Hinne, M Krug, K Lundell, H Schmidt, MN Van Gerven, MAJ Mørup, M Dyrby, TB |
| author_sort | Ambrosen, KS |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Evaluation of the structural connectivity (SC) of the brain based on tractography has mainly focused on the choice of diffusion model, tractography algorithm, and their respective parameter settings. Here, we systematically validate SC derived from a post mortem monkey brain, while varying key acquisition parameters such as the b-value, gradient angular resolution and image resolution. As gold standard we use the connectivity matrix obtained invasively with histological tracers by Markov et al. (2014). As performance metric, we use cross entropy as a measure that enables comparison of the relative tracer labelled neuron counts to the streamline counts from tractography. We find that high angular resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio are important to estimate SC, and that SC derived from low image resolution (1.0³ mm³) are in better agreement with the tracer network, than those derived from high image resolution (0.5³ mm³) or at an even lower image resolution (2.0³ mm³). In contradiction, sensitivity and specificity analyses suggest that if the angular resolution is sufficient, the balanced compromise in which sensitivity and specificity are identical remains 60-64% regardless of the other scanning parameters. Interestingly, the tracer graph is assumed to be the gold standard but by thresholding, the balanced compromise increases to 70-75%. Hence, by using performance metrics based on binarized tracer graphs, one risks losing important information, changing the performance of SC graphs derived by tractography and their dependence of different scanning parameters. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:18:05Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:0550a95c-a0b3-4e1e-bb50-17807ab052a8 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:18:05Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:0550a95c-a0b3-4e1e-bb50-17807ab052a82022-03-26T08:56:33ZValidation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parametersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0550a95c-a0b3-4e1e-bb50-17807ab052a8EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2019Ambrosen, KSEskildsen, SFHinne, MKrug, KLundell, HSchmidt, MNVan Gerven, MAJMørup, MDyrby, TBEvaluation of the structural connectivity (SC) of the brain based on tractography has mainly focused on the choice of diffusion model, tractography algorithm, and their respective parameter settings. Here, we systematically validate SC derived from a post mortem monkey brain, while varying key acquisition parameters such as the b-value, gradient angular resolution and image resolution. As gold standard we use the connectivity matrix obtained invasively with histological tracers by Markov et al. (2014). As performance metric, we use cross entropy as a measure that enables comparison of the relative tracer labelled neuron counts to the streamline counts from tractography. We find that high angular resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio are important to estimate SC, and that SC derived from low image resolution (1.0³ mm³) are in better agreement with the tracer network, than those derived from high image resolution (0.5³ mm³) or at an even lower image resolution (2.0³ mm³). In contradiction, sensitivity and specificity analyses suggest that if the angular resolution is sufficient, the balanced compromise in which sensitivity and specificity are identical remains 60-64% regardless of the other scanning parameters. Interestingly, the tracer graph is assumed to be the gold standard but by thresholding, the balanced compromise increases to 70-75%. Hence, by using performance metrics based on binarized tracer graphs, one risks losing important information, changing the performance of SC graphs derived by tractography and their dependence of different scanning parameters. |
| spellingShingle | Ambrosen, KS Eskildsen, SF Hinne, M Krug, K Lundell, H Schmidt, MN Van Gerven, MAJ Mørup, M Dyrby, TB Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title | Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title_full | Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title_fullStr | Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title_short | Validation of structural brain connectivity networks: The impact of scanning parameters |
| title_sort | validation of structural brain connectivity networks the impact of scanning parameters |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ambrosenks validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT eskildsensf validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT hinnem validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT krugk validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT lundellh validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT schmidtmn validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT vangervenmaj validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT mørupm validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters AT dyrbytb validationofstructuralbrainconnectivitynetworkstheimpactofscanningparameters |