Flawed external validation study of the ADNEX model to diagnose ovarian cancer.
<p>External validation studies of prediction models are of utmost importance in order to assess the performance a prediction model in different locations. We therefore read with interest the recent external validation study of the ADNEX model 1</p> <br/> <p>For patients with...
Main Authors: | Van Calster, B, Steyerberg, E, Bourne, T, Timmerman, D, Collins, G, TG6 of the STRATOS initiative |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Clinical utility of risk models to refer patients with adnexal masses to specialized oncology care: multicenter external validation using decision curve analysis.
by: Wynants, L, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Performance of the RMI and IOTA ADNEX and Simple Rules risk model in the evaluation of adnexal masses not classifiable using the Easy Descriptors as first step
by: Froyman, W, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Identifying women with undetected ovarian cancer: independent and external validation of QCancer(®) (Ovarian) prediction model.
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Flawed validation of FRAX
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Characterization of adnexal masses using multidetector contrast-enhanced CT scan - recognising common pitfalls that masquerade as ovarian cancer
by: Suppiah, Subapriya, et al.
Published: (2017)