Flawed external validation study of the ADNEX model to diagnose ovarian cancer.
<p>External validation studies of prediction models are of utmost importance in order to assess the performance a prediction model in different locations. We therefore read with interest the recent external validation study of the ADNEX model 1</p> <br/> <p>For patients with...
Autors principals: | Van Calster, B, Steyerberg, E, Bourne, T, Timmerman, D, Collins, G, TG6 of the STRATOS initiative |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicat: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Ítems similars
-
ADNEX risk prediction model for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies
per: Jan Y Verbakel, et al.
Publicat: (2024-08-01) -
Clinical utility of risk models to refer patients with adnexal masses to specialized oncology care: multicenter external validation using decision curve analysis.
per: Wynants, L, et al.
Publicat: (2017) -
Flawed validation of FRAX
per: Collins, G, et al.
Publicat: (2016) -
Performance of the RMI and IOTA ADNEX and Simple Rules risk model in the evaluation of adnexal masses not classifiable using the Easy Descriptors as first step
per: Froyman, W, et al.
Publicat: (2016) -
Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models
per: Testa Antonia C, et al.
Publicat: (2010-10-01)