When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping

Background Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sailer, S, Coassin, S, Lackner, K, Fischer, C, McNeill, E, Streiter, G, Kremser, C, Maglione, M, Green, CM, Moralli, D, Moschen, AR, Keller, MA, Golderer, G, Werner-Felmayer, G, Tegeder, I, Channon, KM, Davies, B, Werner, ER, Watschinger, K
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2021
_version_ 1797051388526592000
author Sailer, S
Coassin, S
Lackner, K
Fischer, C
McNeill, E
Streiter, G
Kremser, C
Maglione, M
Green, CM
Moralli, D
Moschen, AR
Keller, MA
Golderer, G
Werner-Felmayer, G
Tegeder, I
Channon, KM
Davies, B
Werner, ER
Watschinger, K
author_facet Sailer, S
Coassin, S
Lackner, K
Fischer, C
McNeill, E
Streiter, G
Kremser, C
Maglione, M
Green, CM
Moralli, D
Moschen, AR
Keller, MA
Golderer, G
Werner-Felmayer, G
Tegeder, I
Channon, KM
Davies, B
Werner, ER
Watschinger, K
author_sort Sailer, S
collection OXFORD
description Background Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. Results We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. Conclusions A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:18:50Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:05929605-0806-450c-abaf-085d4a4ce6a0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:18:50Z
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:05929605-0806-450c-abaf-085d4a4ce6a02022-03-26T08:57:56ZWhen the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotypingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:05929605-0806-450c-abaf-085d4a4ce6a0EnglishSymplectic ElementsBioMed Central2021Sailer, SCoassin, SLackner, KFischer, CMcNeill, EStreiter, GKremser, CMaglione, MGreen, CMMoralli, DMoschen, ARKeller, MAGolderer, GWerner-Felmayer, GTegeder, IChannon, KMDavies, BWerner, ERWatschinger, KBackground Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. Results We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. Conclusions A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms.
spellingShingle Sailer, S
Coassin, S
Lackner, K
Fischer, C
McNeill, E
Streiter, G
Kremser, C
Maglione, M
Green, CM
Moralli, D
Moschen, AR
Keller, MA
Golderer, G
Werner-Felmayer, G
Tegeder, I
Channon, KM
Davies, B
Werner, ER
Watschinger, K
When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_full When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_fullStr When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_full_unstemmed When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_short When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_sort when the genome bluffs a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
work_keys_str_mv AT sailers whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT coassins whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT lacknerk whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT fischerc whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT mcneille whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT streiterg whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT kremserc whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT maglionem whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT greencm whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT morallid whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT moschenar whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT kellerma whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT goldererg whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT wernerfelmayerg whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT tegederi whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT channonkm whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT daviesb whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT wernerer whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT watschingerk whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping