Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
Virginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbou...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016
|
_version_ | 1797051427978215424 |
---|---|
author | Armitage, J Baigent, C Collins, R |
author_facet | Armitage, J Baigent, C Collins, R |
author_sort | Armitage, J |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Virginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbour only recused herself in September, 2015, 8 months after she had adjudicated on the submission in January, 2015. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:19:25Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaa |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:19:25Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaa2022-03-26T08:58:56ZLessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaaEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2016Armitage, JBaigent, CCollins, RVirginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbour only recused herself in September, 2015, 8 months after she had adjudicated on the submission in January, 2015. |
spellingShingle | Armitage, J Baigent, C Collins, R Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title | Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title_full | Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title_fullStr | Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title_full_unstemmed | Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title_short | Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply. |
title_sort | lessons from the controversy over statins authors reply |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armitagej lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply AT baigentc lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply AT collinsr lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply |