Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.

Virginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armitage, J, Baigent, C, Collins, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016
_version_ 1797051427978215424
author Armitage, J
Baigent, C
Collins, R
author_facet Armitage, J
Baigent, C
Collins, R
author_sort Armitage, J
collection OXFORD
description Virginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbour only recused herself in September, 2015, 8 months after she had adjudicated on the submission in January, 2015.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:19:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:19:25Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaa2022-03-26T08:58:56ZLessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:05c57583-86ee-48ef-ad89-e11ce4d39eaaEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2016Armitage, JBaigent, CCollins, RVirginia Barbour states in her letter that, with respect to the submission to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in October, 2014, by a group of senior doctors and scientists, she had “recused myself because of a potential conflict of interest”. However, that is not strictly accurate; Barbour only recused herself in September, 2015, 8 months after she had adjudicated on the submission in January, 2015.
spellingShingle Armitage, J
Baigent, C
Collins, R
Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title_full Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title_fullStr Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title_full_unstemmed Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title_short Lessons from the controversy over statins - Authors' reply.
title_sort lessons from the controversy over statins authors reply
work_keys_str_mv AT armitagej lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply
AT baigentc lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply
AT collinsr lessonsfromthecontroversyoverstatinsauthorsreply