Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients

<p>Background: Some viruses are known to be transmissible by blood transfusion. Intensive viral screening of transfused blood now exists in most countries. In the UK, high-sensitivity nucleic acid amplification tests for hepatitis C virus were introduced in 1999 and it was thought that this wo...

Popoln opis

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Yang, T, Cairns, B, Reeves, G, Green, J, Beral, V
Format: Journal article
Izdano: Oxford University Press 2016
_version_ 1826257537493630976
author Yang, T
Cairns, B
Reeves, G
Green, J
Beral, V
author_facet Yang, T
Cairns, B
Reeves, G
Green, J
Beral, V
author_sort Yang, T
collection OXFORD
description <p>Background: Some viruses are known to be transmissible by blood transfusion. Intensive viral screening of transfused blood now exists in most countries. In the UK, high-sensitivity nucleic acid amplification tests for hepatitis C virus were introduced in 1999 and it was thought that this would reduce, and possibly eliminate, transfusion-related liver cancer. We aimed to investigate cancer risk in recipient of blood transfusion in 2000 or after.</p> <p>Methods: 1.3 million UK women recruited in 1998, on average, were followed for hospital records of blood transfusion and for cancer registrations. After excluding women with cancer or precancerous conditions before or at the time of transfusion, Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks of 11 site-specific cancers for women with compared to without prior blood transfusion.</p> <p>Results: During follow up, 11,274 (0.9%) women had a first recorded transfusion in 2000 or after, and 1648 (14.6%) of them were subsequently diagnosed with cancer, a mean 6.8 years after the transfusion. In the first 5 years after transfusion there were, as expected, significant excesses for most site-specific cancers examined, presumably because some had preclinical cancer. However, 5 or more years (mean 8 years) after blood transfusion there were significant excess risks only for liver cancer (relative risk=2.63, 95%CI 1.45-4.78) and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (relative risk=1.74, 1.21-2.51). When analyses were restricted to those undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, the commonest procedure associated with transfusion, these risks were not materially altered.</p> <p>Conclusions: In a large cohort of UK women, 21st century transfusions were associated with long-term increased risks of liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. These findings suggest that some cases of liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma are caused by carcinogenic agents that are not currently screened for in transfused blood.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:19:47Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:05e0e36c-a3e7-4d8a-a819-3bbc8bead503
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:19:47Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:05e0e36c-a3e7-4d8a-a819-3bbc8bead5032022-03-26T08:59:33ZCancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipientsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:05e0e36c-a3e7-4d8a-a819-3bbc8bead503Symplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2016Yang, TCairns, BReeves, GGreen, JBeral, V<p>Background: Some viruses are known to be transmissible by blood transfusion. Intensive viral screening of transfused blood now exists in most countries. In the UK, high-sensitivity nucleic acid amplification tests for hepatitis C virus were introduced in 1999 and it was thought that this would reduce, and possibly eliminate, transfusion-related liver cancer. We aimed to investigate cancer risk in recipient of blood transfusion in 2000 or after.</p> <p>Methods: 1.3 million UK women recruited in 1998, on average, were followed for hospital records of blood transfusion and for cancer registrations. After excluding women with cancer or precancerous conditions before or at the time of transfusion, Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks of 11 site-specific cancers for women with compared to without prior blood transfusion.</p> <p>Results: During follow up, 11,274 (0.9%) women had a first recorded transfusion in 2000 or after, and 1648 (14.6%) of them were subsequently diagnosed with cancer, a mean 6.8 years after the transfusion. In the first 5 years after transfusion there were, as expected, significant excesses for most site-specific cancers examined, presumably because some had preclinical cancer. However, 5 or more years (mean 8 years) after blood transfusion there were significant excess risks only for liver cancer (relative risk=2.63, 95%CI 1.45-4.78) and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (relative risk=1.74, 1.21-2.51). When analyses were restricted to those undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, the commonest procedure associated with transfusion, these risks were not materially altered.</p> <p>Conclusions: In a large cohort of UK women, 21st century transfusions were associated with long-term increased risks of liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. These findings suggest that some cases of liver cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma are caused by carcinogenic agents that are not currently screened for in transfused blood.</p>
spellingShingle Yang, T
Cairns, B
Reeves, G
Green, J
Beral, V
Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title_full Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title_fullStr Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title_full_unstemmed Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title_short Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
title_sort cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients
work_keys_str_mv AT yangt cancerriskamong21stcenturybloodtransfusionrecipients
AT cairnsb cancerriskamong21stcenturybloodtransfusionrecipients
AT reevesg cancerriskamong21stcenturybloodtransfusionrecipients
AT greenj cancerriskamong21stcenturybloodtransfusionrecipients
AT beralv cancerriskamong21stcenturybloodtransfusionrecipients