Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review

BACKGROUND:<br>Shortages of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the extended use or re-use of single-use respirators and surgical masks by frontline healthcare workers. The evidence base underpinning such practices warrants examination. <br>OBJECTIVES:&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toomey, E, Conway, Y, Burton, C, Smith, S, Smalle, M, Chan, X, Adisesh, A, Tanveer, S, Ross, L, Thomson, I, Devane, D, Greenhalgh, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020
_version_ 1797051592098185216
author Toomey, E
Conway, Y
Burton, C
Smith, S
Smalle, M
Chan, X
Adisesh, A
Tanveer, S
Ross, L
Thomson, I
Devane, D
Greenhalgh, T
author_facet Toomey, E
Conway, Y
Burton, C
Smith, S
Smalle, M
Chan, X
Adisesh, A
Tanveer, S
Ross, L
Thomson, I
Devane, D
Greenhalgh, T
author_sort Toomey, E
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND:<br>Shortages of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the extended use or re-use of single-use respirators and surgical masks by frontline healthcare workers. The evidence base underpinning such practices warrants examination. <br>OBJECTIVES:<br>To synthesise current guidance and systematic review evidence on extended use, re-use, or reprocessing of single-use surgical masks or filtering facepiece respirators. <br>DATA SOURCES:<br>World Health Organization, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Public Health England websites to identify guidance. Medline, Pubmed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database and preprint servers for systematic reviews. METHODS:Two reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. Quality of included systematic reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Findings were narratively synthesised. <br>RESULTS:<br>Six guidance documents were identified. Levels of detail and consistency across documents varied. Four high-quality systematic reviews were included: three focused on reprocessing (decontamination) of N95 respirators, one on reprocessing of surgical masks. Vaporised hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation were highlighted as the most promising reprocessing methods, but evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of different methods was limited. We found no well-established methods for reprocessing respirators at scale. <br>CONCLUSIONS:<br>There is limited evidence on the impact of extended use and re-use of surgical masks and respirators and gaps and inconsistencies exist in current guidance. Where extended use or re-use is being practiced, healthcare organisations should ensure that policies and systems are in place to ensure these practices are carried out safely and in line with available guidance.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:21:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:0683232f-2345-4de3-802c-00d1f278230d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:21:42Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:0683232f-2345-4de3-802c-00d1f278230d2022-03-26T09:02:59ZExtended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0683232f-2345-4de3-802c-00d1f278230dEnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2020Toomey, EConway, YBurton, CSmith, SSmalle, MChan, XAdisesh, ATanveer, SRoss, LThomson, IDevane, DGreenhalgh, TBACKGROUND:<br>Shortages of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the extended use or re-use of single-use respirators and surgical masks by frontline healthcare workers. The evidence base underpinning such practices warrants examination. <br>OBJECTIVES:<br>To synthesise current guidance and systematic review evidence on extended use, re-use, or reprocessing of single-use surgical masks or filtering facepiece respirators. <br>DATA SOURCES:<br>World Health Organization, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Public Health England websites to identify guidance. Medline, Pubmed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database and preprint servers for systematic reviews. METHODS:Two reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. Quality of included systematic reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Findings were narratively synthesised. <br>RESULTS:<br>Six guidance documents were identified. Levels of detail and consistency across documents varied. Four high-quality systematic reviews were included: three focused on reprocessing (decontamination) of N95 respirators, one on reprocessing of surgical masks. Vaporised hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation were highlighted as the most promising reprocessing methods, but evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of different methods was limited. We found no well-established methods for reprocessing respirators at scale. <br>CONCLUSIONS:<br>There is limited evidence on the impact of extended use and re-use of surgical masks and respirators and gaps and inconsistencies exist in current guidance. Where extended use or re-use is being practiced, healthcare organisations should ensure that policies and systems are in place to ensure these practices are carried out safely and in line with available guidance.
spellingShingle Toomey, E
Conway, Y
Burton, C
Smith, S
Smalle, M
Chan, X
Adisesh, A
Tanveer, S
Ross, L
Thomson, I
Devane, D
Greenhalgh, T
Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title_full Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title_fullStr Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title_short Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: a rapid systematic review
title_sort extended use or re use of single use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during covid 19 a rapid systematic review
work_keys_str_mv AT toomeye extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT conwayy extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT burtonc extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT smiths extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT smallem extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT chanx extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT adisesha extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT tanveers extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT rossl extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT thomsoni extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT devaned extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview
AT greenhalght extendeduseorreuseofsingleusesurgicalmasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsduringcovid19arapidsystematicreview