Memory and probability
In many economic decisions, people estimate probabilities, such as the likelihood that a risk materializes or that a job applicant will be a productive employee, by retrieving experiences from memory. We model this process based on two established regularities of selective recall: similarity and int...
Váldodahkkit: | , , , , |
---|---|
Materiálatiipa: | Journal article |
Giella: | English |
Almmustuhtton: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
_version_ | 1826314357023178752 |
---|---|
author | Bordalo, P Conlon, JJ Gennaioli, N Kwon, SY Shleifer, A |
author_facet | Bordalo, P Conlon, JJ Gennaioli, N Kwon, SY Shleifer, A |
author_sort | Bordalo, P |
collection | OXFORD |
description | In many economic decisions, people estimate probabilities, such as the likelihood that a risk materializes or that a job applicant will be a productive employee, by retrieving experiences from memory. We model this process based on two established regularities of selective recall: similarity and interference. We show that the similarity structure of a hypothesis and the way it is described (not just its objective probability) shape the recall of experiences and thus probability assessments. The model accounts for and reconciles a variety of empirical findings, such as overestimation of unlikely events when these are cued versus neglect of noncued ones, the availability heuristic, the representativeness heuristic, conjunction and disjunction fallacies, and over- versus underreaction to information in different situations. The model yields several new predictions, for which we find strong experimental support. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:50Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:06921dee-0086-4fb4-9199-911e7a655984 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:50Z |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:06921dee-0086-4fb4-9199-911e7a6559842024-09-05T15:53:42ZMemory and probability Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:06921dee-0086-4fb4-9199-911e7a655984EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2022Bordalo, PConlon, JJGennaioli, NKwon, SYShleifer, AIn many economic decisions, people estimate probabilities, such as the likelihood that a risk materializes or that a job applicant will be a productive employee, by retrieving experiences from memory. We model this process based on two established regularities of selective recall: similarity and interference. We show that the similarity structure of a hypothesis and the way it is described (not just its objective probability) shape the recall of experiences and thus probability assessments. The model accounts for and reconciles a variety of empirical findings, such as overestimation of unlikely events when these are cued versus neglect of noncued ones, the availability heuristic, the representativeness heuristic, conjunction and disjunction fallacies, and over- versus underreaction to information in different situations. The model yields several new predictions, for which we find strong experimental support. |
spellingShingle | Bordalo, P Conlon, JJ Gennaioli, N Kwon, SY Shleifer, A Memory and probability |
title | Memory and probability |
title_full | Memory and probability |
title_fullStr | Memory and probability |
title_full_unstemmed | Memory and probability |
title_short | Memory and probability |
title_sort | memory and probability |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bordalop memoryandprobability AT conlonjj memoryandprobability AT gennaiolin memoryandprobability AT kwonsy memoryandprobability AT shleifera memoryandprobability |