Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.

BACKGROUND: The control of Clostridium difficile infection is a major international healthcare priority, hindered by a limited understanding of transmission epidemiology for these bacteria. However, transmission studies of bacterial pathogens are rapidly being transformed by the advent of next gener...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Didelot, X, Eyre, D, Cule, M, Ip, C, Ansari, M, Griffiths, D, Vaughan, A, O'Connor, L, Golubchik, T, Batty, E, Piazza, P, Wilson, D, Bowden, R, Donnelly, P, Dingle, K, Wilcox, M, Walker, A, Crook, D, Peto, T, Harding, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1826257775220490240
author Didelot, X
Eyre, D
Cule, M
Ip, C
Ansari, M
Griffiths, D
Vaughan, A
O'Connor, L
Golubchik, T
Batty, E
Piazza, P
Wilson, D
Bowden, R
Donnelly, P
Dingle, K
Wilcox, M
Walker, A
Crook, D
Peto, T
Harding, R
author_facet Didelot, X
Eyre, D
Cule, M
Ip, C
Ansari, M
Griffiths, D
Vaughan, A
O'Connor, L
Golubchik, T
Batty, E
Piazza, P
Wilson, D
Bowden, R
Donnelly, P
Dingle, K
Wilcox, M
Walker, A
Crook, D
Peto, T
Harding, R
author_sort Didelot, X
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: The control of Clostridium difficile infection is a major international healthcare priority, hindered by a limited understanding of transmission epidemiology for these bacteria. However, transmission studies of bacterial pathogens are rapidly being transformed by the advent of next generation sequencing. RESULTS: Here we sequence whole C. difficile genomes from 486 cases arising over four years in Oxfordshire. We show that we can estimate the times back to common ancestors of bacterial lineages with sufficient resolution to distinguish whether direct transmission is plausible or not. Time depths were inferred using a within-host evolutionary rate that we estimated at 1.4 mutations per genome per year based on serially isolated genomes. The subset of plausible transmissions was found to be highly associated with pairs of patients sharing time and space in hospital. Conversely, the large majority of pairs of genomes matched by conventional typing and isolated from patients within a month of each other were too distantly related to be direct transmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that nosocomial transmission between symptomatic C. difficile cases contributes far less to current rates of infection than has been widely assumed, which clarifies the importance of future research into other transmission routes, such as from asymptomatic carriers. With the costs of DNA sequencing rapidly falling and its use becoming more and more widespread, genomics will revolutionize our understanding of the transmission of bacterial pathogens.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:23:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:07208198-adae-4926-b253-75b5c1ba24bc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:23:30Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:07208198-adae-4926-b253-75b5c1ba24bc2022-03-26T09:06:05ZMicroevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:07208198-adae-4926-b253-75b5c1ba24bcEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Didelot, XEyre, DCule, MIp, CAnsari, MGriffiths, DVaughan, AO'Connor, LGolubchik, TBatty, EPiazza, PWilson, DBowden, RDonnelly, PDingle, KWilcox, MWalker, ACrook, DPeto, THarding, RBACKGROUND: The control of Clostridium difficile infection is a major international healthcare priority, hindered by a limited understanding of transmission epidemiology for these bacteria. However, transmission studies of bacterial pathogens are rapidly being transformed by the advent of next generation sequencing. RESULTS: Here we sequence whole C. difficile genomes from 486 cases arising over four years in Oxfordshire. We show that we can estimate the times back to common ancestors of bacterial lineages with sufficient resolution to distinguish whether direct transmission is plausible or not. Time depths were inferred using a within-host evolutionary rate that we estimated at 1.4 mutations per genome per year based on serially isolated genomes. The subset of plausible transmissions was found to be highly associated with pairs of patients sharing time and space in hospital. Conversely, the large majority of pairs of genomes matched by conventional typing and isolated from patients within a month of each other were too distantly related to be direct transmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that nosocomial transmission between symptomatic C. difficile cases contributes far less to current rates of infection than has been widely assumed, which clarifies the importance of future research into other transmission routes, such as from asymptomatic carriers. With the costs of DNA sequencing rapidly falling and its use becoming more and more widespread, genomics will revolutionize our understanding of the transmission of bacterial pathogens.
spellingShingle Didelot, X
Eyre, D
Cule, M
Ip, C
Ansari, M
Griffiths, D
Vaughan, A
O'Connor, L
Golubchik, T
Batty, E
Piazza, P
Wilson, D
Bowden, R
Donnelly, P
Dingle, K
Wilcox, M
Walker, A
Crook, D
Peto, T
Harding, R
Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title_full Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title_fullStr Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title_full_unstemmed Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title_short Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission.
title_sort microevolutionary analysis of clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission
work_keys_str_mv AT didelotx microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT eyred microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT culem microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT ipc microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT ansarim microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT griffithsd microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT vaughana microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT oconnorl microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT golubchikt microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT battye microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT piazzap microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT wilsond microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT bowdenr microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT donnellyp microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT dinglek microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT wilcoxm microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT walkera microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT crookd microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT petot microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission
AT hardingr microevolutionaryanalysisofclostridiumdifficilegenomestoinvestigatetransmission