A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia

<p><b>Background:</b> An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. </p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in pre-eclampsia trials. </p><p><b>Search strategy:</...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duffy, J, Hirsch, M, Gale, C, Pealing, L, Kawsar, A, Showell, M, Williamson, P, Khan, K, Ziebland, S, McManus, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
_version_ 1797051759249588224
author Duffy, J
Hirsch, M
Gale, C
Pealing, L
Kawsar, A
Showell, M
Williamson, P
Khan, K
Ziebland, S
McManus, R
author_facet Duffy, J
Hirsch, M
Gale, C
Pealing, L
Kawsar, A
Showell, M
Williamson, P
Khan, K
Ziebland, S
McManus, R
author_sort Duffy, J
collection OXFORD
description <p><b>Background:</b> An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. </p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in pre-eclampsia trials. </p><p><b>Search strategy:</b> Five online databases were searched from inception to January 2016 using terms including “preeclampsia” and “randomized controlled trial”. </p><p><b>Selection criteria:</b> Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia published in any language were included. </p><p><b>Data collection and analysis:</b> Primary outcomes and data on outcome measure reporting were systematically extracted and categorized. </p><p><b>Main results:</b> Overall, 79 randomized trials including data from 31 615 women were included. Of those, 38 (48%) reported 35 different primary outcomes; 28 were maternal outcomes and seven were fetal/neonatal outcomes. Three randomized trials reported composite outcomes, incorporating between six and nine outcome components. The method of definition or measurement was infrequently or poorly reported. Even when outcomes were consistent across trials, different methods of definition or measurement were frequently described. </p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> In randomized trials evaluating interventions for pre-eclampsia, critical information related to the primary outcome, including definition and measurement, is regularly omitted. Developing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia trials would help to inform primary outcome selection and outcome measure reporting.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:24:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:0752cd29-3fbe-45b9-a261-0a86889d573c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:24:04Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:0752cd29-3fbe-45b9-a261-0a86889d573c2022-03-26T09:06:59ZA systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsiaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0752cd29-3fbe-45b9-a261-0a86889d573cEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2017Duffy, JHirsch, MGale, CPealing, LKawsar, AShowell, MWilliamson, PKhan, KZiebland, SMcManus, R <p><b>Background:</b> An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. </p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in pre-eclampsia trials. </p><p><b>Search strategy:</b> Five online databases were searched from inception to January 2016 using terms including “preeclampsia” and “randomized controlled trial”. </p><p><b>Selection criteria:</b> Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia published in any language were included. </p><p><b>Data collection and analysis:</b> Primary outcomes and data on outcome measure reporting were systematically extracted and categorized. </p><p><b>Main results:</b> Overall, 79 randomized trials including data from 31 615 women were included. Of those, 38 (48%) reported 35 different primary outcomes; 28 were maternal outcomes and seven were fetal/neonatal outcomes. Three randomized trials reported composite outcomes, incorporating between six and nine outcome components. The method of definition or measurement was infrequently or poorly reported. Even when outcomes were consistent across trials, different methods of definition or measurement were frequently described. </p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> In randomized trials evaluating interventions for pre-eclampsia, critical information related to the primary outcome, including definition and measurement, is regularly omitted. Developing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia trials would help to inform primary outcome selection and outcome measure reporting.</p>
spellingShingle Duffy, J
Hirsch, M
Gale, C
Pealing, L
Kawsar, A
Showell, M
Williamson, P
Khan, K
Ziebland, S
McManus, R
A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title_full A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title_fullStr A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title_short A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
title_sort systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre eclampsia
work_keys_str_mv AT duffyj asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT hirschm asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT galec asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT pealingl asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT kawsara asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT showellm asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT williamsonp asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT khank asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT zieblands asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT mcmanusr asystematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT duffyj systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT hirschm systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT galec systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT pealingl systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT kawsara systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT showellm systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT williamsonp systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT khank systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT zieblands systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia
AT mcmanusr systematicreviewofprimaryoutcomesandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomizedtrialsevaluatingtreatmentsforpreeclampsia