Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
Background and context of the study: Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of ne...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2025
|
| _version_ | 1824459057166024704 |
|---|---|
| author | de Oliveira-Souza, AIS Barbosa-Silva, J Gross, DP da Costa, BR Ballenberger, N Pereira, TV Dennett, L Armijo-Olivo, S |
| author_facet | de Oliveira-Souza, AIS Barbosa-Silva, J Gross, DP da Costa, BR Ballenberger, N Pereira, TV Dennett, L Armijo-Olivo, S |
| author_sort | de Oliveira-Souza, AIS |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Background and context of the study: Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question: What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study: (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology: Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions: This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:35:44Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:07601d04-4ac7-4292-837d-2fee8c555d16 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:35:44Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:07601d04-4ac7-4292-837d-2fee8c555d162025-01-31T20:11:28ZComparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:07601d04-4ac7-4292-837d-2fee8c555d16EnglishJisc Publications RouterBioMed Central2025de Oliveira-Souza, AISBarbosa-Silva, JGross, DPda Costa, BRBallenberger, NPereira, TVDennett, LArmijo-Olivo, SBackground and context of the study: Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question: What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study: (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology: Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions: This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future. |
| spellingShingle | de Oliveira-Souza, AIS Barbosa-Silva, J Gross, DP da Costa, BR Ballenberger, N Pereira, TV Dennett, L Armijo-Olivo, S Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title_full | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title_short | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
| title_sort | comparative effectiveness of manual therapy pharmacological treatment exercise therapy and education for neck pain compete study protocol of a systematic review with network meta analysis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirasouzaais comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT barbosasilvaj comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT grossdp comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT dacostabr comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT ballenbergern comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT pereiratv comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT dennettl comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT armijoolivos comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis |