Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey
Background: Post graduate master’s degree qualifications are increasingly required to advance allied health profession careers in education, clinical practice, leadership, and research. Successful awards are dependent on completion of a research dissertation project. Despite the high volume of exper...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811139889411915776 |
|---|---|
| author | Cordrey, T Thomas, A King, E Gustafson, O |
| author_facet | Cordrey, T Thomas, A King, E Gustafson, O |
| author_sort | Cordrey, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Background: Post graduate master’s degree qualifications are increasingly required to advance allied health profession careers in education, clinical practice, leadership, and research. Successful awards are dependent on completion of a research dissertation project. Despite the high volume of experience gained and research undertaken at this level, the benefits and impact are not well understood. Our study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree training and research on allied health profession practice and research activity. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey design was used to collect data from allied health professionals working in the United Kingdom who had completed a postgraduate master’s degree. Participants were recruited voluntarily using social media and clinical interest group advertisement. Data was collected between October and December 2022 and was analysed using descriptive statistics and narrative content analysis. Informed consent was gained, and the study was approved by the university research ethics committee. Results: Eighty-four responses were received from nine allied health professions with paramedics and physiotherapists forming the majority (57%) of respondents. Primary motivation for completion of the master’s degree was for clinical career progression (n = 44, 52.4%) and formation of the research dissertation question was predominantly sourced from individual ideas (n = 58, 69%). Formal research output was low with 27.4% (n = 23) of projects published in peer reviewed journal and a third of projects reporting no output or dissemination at all. Perceived impact was rated highest in individual learning outcomes, such as improving confidence and capability in clinical practice and research skills. Ongoing research engagement and activity was high with over two thirds (n = 57, 67.9%) involved in formal research projects. Conclusion: The focus of master's degree level research was largely self-generated with the highest perceived impact on individual outcomes rather than broader clinical service and organisation influence. Formal output from master’s research was low, but ongoing research engagement and activity was high suggesting master’s degree training is an under-recognised source for AHP research capacity building. Future research should investigate the potential benefits of better coordinated and prioritised research at master’s degree level on professional and organisational impact. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:13:15Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:083c3690-fe5c-4ed4-8621-3b377d211fb6 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:13:15Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:083c3690-fe5c-4ed4-8621-3b377d211fb62024-07-12T20:06:54ZEvaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional surveyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:083c3690-fe5c-4ed4-8621-3b377d211fb6EnglishJisc Publications RouterBioMed Central2024Cordrey, TThomas, AKing, EGustafson, OBackground: Post graduate master’s degree qualifications are increasingly required to advance allied health profession careers in education, clinical practice, leadership, and research. Successful awards are dependent on completion of a research dissertation project. Despite the high volume of experience gained and research undertaken at this level, the benefits and impact are not well understood. Our study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree training and research on allied health profession practice and research activity. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey design was used to collect data from allied health professionals working in the United Kingdom who had completed a postgraduate master’s degree. Participants were recruited voluntarily using social media and clinical interest group advertisement. Data was collected between October and December 2022 and was analysed using descriptive statistics and narrative content analysis. Informed consent was gained, and the study was approved by the university research ethics committee. Results: Eighty-four responses were received from nine allied health professions with paramedics and physiotherapists forming the majority (57%) of respondents. Primary motivation for completion of the master’s degree was for clinical career progression (n = 44, 52.4%) and formation of the research dissertation question was predominantly sourced from individual ideas (n = 58, 69%). Formal research output was low with 27.4% (n = 23) of projects published in peer reviewed journal and a third of projects reporting no output or dissemination at all. Perceived impact was rated highest in individual learning outcomes, such as improving confidence and capability in clinical practice and research skills. Ongoing research engagement and activity was high with over two thirds (n = 57, 67.9%) involved in formal research projects. Conclusion: The focus of master's degree level research was largely self-generated with the highest perceived impact on individual outcomes rather than broader clinical service and organisation influence. Formal output from master’s research was low, but ongoing research engagement and activity was high suggesting master’s degree training is an under-recognised source for AHP research capacity building. Future research should investigate the potential benefits of better coordinated and prioritised research at master’s degree level on professional and organisational impact. |
| spellingShingle | Cordrey, T Thomas, A King, E Gustafson, O Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title | Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title_full | Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title_short | Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master’s degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey |
| title_sort | evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master s degree level research in the allied health professions a uk wide cross sectional survey |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cordreyt evaluatingtheperceivedimpactandlegacyofmastersdegreelevelresearchinthealliedhealthprofessionsaukwidecrosssectionalsurvey AT thomasa evaluatingtheperceivedimpactandlegacyofmastersdegreelevelresearchinthealliedhealthprofessionsaukwidecrosssectionalsurvey AT kinge evaluatingtheperceivedimpactandlegacyofmastersdegreelevelresearchinthealliedhealthprofessionsaukwidecrosssectionalsurvey AT gustafsono evaluatingtheperceivedimpactandlegacyofmastersdegreelevelresearchinthealliedhealthprofessionsaukwidecrosssectionalsurvey |