Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.

The results of recent empirical investigations in research synthesis imply that research ethics committees are behaving unethically by endorsing new research which is unnecessary and by acquiescing in biased under-reporting of research which they have approved. The performance and accountability of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Savulescu, J, Chalmers, I, Blunt, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1996
_version_ 1826257993526673408
author Savulescu, J
Chalmers, I
Blunt, J
author_facet Savulescu, J
Chalmers, I
Blunt, J
author_sort Savulescu, J
collection OXFORD
description The results of recent empirical investigations in research synthesis imply that research ethics committees are behaving unethically by endorsing new research which is unnecessary and by acquiescing in biased under-reporting of research which they have approved. The performance and accountability of research ethics committees would be improved if they required those proposing research to present systematic reviews of relevant previous research in support of their applications; to summarise the results of these reviews in the information prepared for potential participants; to register new controlled trials at inception; and to ensure that the results of these trials are made publicly available within a reasonable period of time after completion of data collection.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:26:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:084cac4f-3928-4cc8-8657-48b106e2b0e6
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:26:58Z
publishDate 1996
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:084cac4f-3928-4cc8-8657-48b106e2b0e62022-03-26T09:12:09ZAre research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:084cac4f-3928-4cc8-8657-48b106e2b0e6EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1996Savulescu, JChalmers, IBlunt, JThe results of recent empirical investigations in research synthesis imply that research ethics committees are behaving unethically by endorsing new research which is unnecessary and by acquiescing in biased under-reporting of research which they have approved. The performance and accountability of research ethics committees would be improved if they required those proposing research to present systematic reviews of relevant previous research in support of their applications; to summarise the results of these reviews in the information prepared for potential participants; to register new controlled trials at inception; and to ensure that the results of these trials are made publicly available within a reasonable period of time after completion of data collection.
spellingShingle Savulescu, J
Chalmers, I
Blunt, J
Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title_full Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title_fullStr Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title_full_unstemmed Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title_short Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
title_sort are research ethics committees behaving unethically some suggestions for improving performance and accountability
work_keys_str_mv AT savulescuj areresearchethicscommitteesbehavingunethicallysomesuggestionsforimprovingperformanceandaccountability
AT chalmersi areresearchethicscommitteesbehavingunethicallysomesuggestionsforimprovingperformanceandaccountability
AT bluntj areresearchethicscommitteesbehavingunethicallysomesuggestionsforimprovingperformanceandaccountability