Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces

We pursue a model-oriented rather than axiomatic approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics, with the idea that new models can often suggest new axioms. This approach has often been fruitful in Logic and Theoretical Computer Science. Rather than seeking to construct a simplified toy model, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abramsky, S
Format: Report
Published: OUCL 2009
_version_ 1797052230294044672
author Abramsky, S
author_facet Abramsky, S
author_sort Abramsky, S
collection OXFORD
description We pursue a model-oriented rather than axiomatic approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics, with the idea that new models can often suggest new axioms. This approach has often been fruitful in Logic and Theoretical Computer Science. Rather than seeking to construct a simplified toy model, we aim for a 'big toy model', in which both quantum and classical systems can be faithfully representedandemdash;as well as, possibly, more exotic kinds of systems. To this end, we show how Chu spaces can be used to represent physical systems of various kinds. In particular, we show how quantum systems can be represented as Chu spaces over the unit interval in such a way that the Chu morphisms correspond exactly to the physically meaningful symmetries of the systemsandemdash;the unitaries and antiunitaries. In this way we obtain a full and faithful functor from the groupoid of Hilbert spaces and their symmetries to Chu spaces. We also consider whether it is possible to use a finite value set rather than the unit interval; we show that two values do not suffice, but three do. We also show a connection between Chu spaces and coalgebras, and make some comparisons between the two frameworks.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:29:33Z
format Report
id oxford-uuid:092c9ba5-8ef7-4010-9059-7ee535013ed1
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:29:33Z
publishDate 2009
publisher OUCL
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:092c9ba5-8ef7-4010-9059-7ee535013ed12022-03-26T09:16:50ZBig Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu SpacesReporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fcuuid:092c9ba5-8ef7-4010-9059-7ee535013ed1Department of Computer ScienceOUCL2009Abramsky, SWe pursue a model-oriented rather than axiomatic approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics, with the idea that new models can often suggest new axioms. This approach has often been fruitful in Logic and Theoretical Computer Science. Rather than seeking to construct a simplified toy model, we aim for a 'big toy model', in which both quantum and classical systems can be faithfully representedandemdash;as well as, possibly, more exotic kinds of systems. To this end, we show how Chu spaces can be used to represent physical systems of various kinds. In particular, we show how quantum systems can be represented as Chu spaces over the unit interval in such a way that the Chu morphisms correspond exactly to the physically meaningful symmetries of the systemsandemdash;the unitaries and antiunitaries. In this way we obtain a full and faithful functor from the groupoid of Hilbert spaces and their symmetries to Chu spaces. We also consider whether it is possible to use a finite value set rather than the unit interval; we show that two values do not suffice, but three do. We also show a connection between Chu spaces and coalgebras, and make some comparisons between the two frameworks.
spellingShingle Abramsky, S
Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title_full Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title_fullStr Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title_full_unstemmed Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title_short Big Toy Models: Representing Physical Systems As Chu Spaces
title_sort big toy models representing physical systems as chu spaces
work_keys_str_mv AT abramskys bigtoymodelsrepresentingphysicalsystemsaschuspaces