The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K
We describe the implications of cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations and galaxy and cluster surveys of large scale structure (LSS) for theories of cosmic structure formation, especially emphasizing the recent Boomerang and Maxima CMB balloon experiments. The inflation-based cosmic structur...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
2000
|
| _version_ | 1797052300741574656 |
|---|---|
| author | Bond, JR Pogosyan, D Prunet, S collaboration, TM Ade, P Balbi, A Bock, J Borrill, J Boscaleri, A Coble, K Crill, B Bernardis, P Farese, P Ferreira, P Ganga, K Giacometti, M Hanany, S Hivon, E Hristov, V Iacoangeli, A Jaffe, A Lange, A Lee, A Martinis, L Masi, S |
| author_facet | Bond, JR Pogosyan, D Prunet, S collaboration, TM Ade, P Balbi, A Bock, J Borrill, J Boscaleri, A Coble, K Crill, B Bernardis, P Farese, P Ferreira, P Ganga, K Giacometti, M Hanany, S Hivon, E Hristov, V Iacoangeli, A Jaffe, A Lange, A Lee, A Martinis, L Masi, S |
| author_sort | Bond, JR |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | We describe the implications of cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations and galaxy and cluster surveys of large scale structure (LSS) for theories of cosmic structure formation, especially emphasizing the recent Boomerang and Maxima CMB balloon experiments. The inflation-based cosmic structure formation paradigm we have been operating with for two decades has never been in better shape. Here we primarily focus on a simplified inflation parameter set, {omega_b,omega_{cdm},Omega_{tot}, Omega_\Lambda,n_s,\tau_C, \sigma_8}. Combining all of the current CMB+LSS data points to the remarkable conclusion that the local Hubble patch we can access has little mean curvature (Omega_{tot}=1.08\pm 0.06) and the initial fluctuations were nearly scale invariant (n_s=1.03\pm 0.08), both predictions of (non-baroque) inflation theory. The baryon density is found to be slightly larger than that preferred by independent Big Bang Nucleosynthesis estimates (omega_b=0.030\pm 0.005 cf. 0.019\pm 0.002). The CDM density is in the expected range (omega_{cdm}=0.17 \pm 0.02). Even stranger is the CMB+LSS evidence that the density of the universe is dominated by unclustered energy akin to the cosmological constant (Omega_\Lambda=0.66\pm 0.06), at the same level as that inferred from high redshift supernova observations. We also sketch the CMB+LSS implications for massive neutrinos. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:30:18Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:096578f0-ccd0-4fa3-b20a-9ab00eecc220 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:30:18Z |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:096578f0-ccd0-4fa3-b20a-9ab00eecc2202022-03-26T09:18:12ZThe Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2KJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:096578f0-ccd0-4fa3-b20a-9ab00eecc220Symplectic Elements at Oxford2000Bond, JRPogosyan, DPrunet, Scollaboration, TMAde, PBalbi, ABock, JBorrill, JBoscaleri, ACoble, KCrill, BBernardis, PFarese, PFerreira, PGanga, KGiacometti, MHanany, SHivon, EHristov, VIacoangeli, AJaffe, ALange, ALee, AMartinis, LMasi, SWe describe the implications of cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations and galaxy and cluster surveys of large scale structure (LSS) for theories of cosmic structure formation, especially emphasizing the recent Boomerang and Maxima CMB balloon experiments. The inflation-based cosmic structure formation paradigm we have been operating with for two decades has never been in better shape. Here we primarily focus on a simplified inflation parameter set, {omega_b,omega_{cdm},Omega_{tot}, Omega_\Lambda,n_s,\tau_C, \sigma_8}. Combining all of the current CMB+LSS data points to the remarkable conclusion that the local Hubble patch we can access has little mean curvature (Omega_{tot}=1.08\pm 0.06) and the initial fluctuations were nearly scale invariant (n_s=1.03\pm 0.08), both predictions of (non-baroque) inflation theory. The baryon density is found to be slightly larger than that preferred by independent Big Bang Nucleosynthesis estimates (omega_b=0.030\pm 0.005 cf. 0.019\pm 0.002). The CDM density is in the expected range (omega_{cdm}=0.17 \pm 0.02). Even stranger is the CMB+LSS evidence that the density of the universe is dominated by unclustered energy akin to the cosmological constant (Omega_\Lambda=0.66\pm 0.06), at the same level as that inferred from high redshift supernova observations. We also sketch the CMB+LSS implications for massive neutrinos. |
| spellingShingle | Bond, JR Pogosyan, D Prunet, S collaboration, TM Ade, P Balbi, A Bock, J Borrill, J Boscaleri, A Coble, K Crill, B Bernardis, P Farese, P Ferreira, P Ganga, K Giacometti, M Hanany, S Hivon, E Hristov, V Iacoangeli, A Jaffe, A Lange, A Lee, A Martinis, L Masi, S The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title | The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title_full | The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title_fullStr | The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title_short | The Cosmic Background Radiation circa nu2K |
| title_sort | cosmic background radiation circa nu2k |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bondjr thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT pogosyand thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT prunets thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT collaborationtm thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT adep thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT balbia thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT bockj thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT borrillj thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT boscaleria thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT coblek thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT crillb thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT bernardisp thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT faresep thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT ferreirap thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT gangak thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT giacomettim thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hananys thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hivone thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hristovv thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT iacoangelia thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT jaffea thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT langea thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT leea thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT martinisl thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT masis thecosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT bondjr cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT pogosyand cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT prunets cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT collaborationtm cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT adep cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT balbia cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT bockj cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT borrillj cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT boscaleria cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT coblek cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT crillb cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT bernardisp cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT faresep cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT ferreirap cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT gangak cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT giacomettim cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hananys cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hivone cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT hristovv cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT iacoangelia cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT jaffea cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT langea cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT leea cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT martinisl cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k AT masis cosmicbackgroundradiationcircanu2k |